About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Indonesian Petroleum Association


24th Annual Convention Proceedings (Volume 2), 1995
Pages 191-208

Comparisons of Conventional Wireline Previous HitResistivityNext Hit Versus Logging-While-Drilling/Measurement-While-Drilling Logs in the Offshore Northwest Java Sea of Indonesia

P. Saputra, B. Sukamto, T. D. Lawrence, J. G. Kaldi


Many oil and gas companies are currently evaluating Logging-While-Drilling (LWD) or Measurement-While-Drilling (MWD) results as a possible alternative to conventional wireline logging measurements. Based on preliminary comparisons, in the Offshore Northwest Java Sea (ONWJ) area of Indonesia, some differences occur between the conventional resistivities and those obtained from LWD/MWD in the same wells. Most of these differences can be interpreted and many reveal valuable information about the formation.

Some of the differences observed between the LWD/MWD and conventional resistivities can be used to locate permeable hydrocarbon zones which have become flushed with mud filtrate and therefore exhibit a difference in Previous HitresistivityNext Hit over time. Other non similarities can often be explained by differences in instrument response and design. Both laterolog and induction type conventional logs are used in the comparisons to LWD/MWD.

In several cases, the LWD/MWD measurements indicate higher resistivities, which leads to more hydrocarbon pay, when compared to the conventional resistivities, apparently due to less mud filtrate invasion at the time of the LWD/MWD measurement. In water bearing sands, however, the deep laterolog resistivities often read higher than either the LWD/MWD or deep induction measurements.

There are certain advantages as well as limitations to each type of Previous HitresistivityNext Hit device. Comparison of these different Previous HitresistivityNext Hit measurements, in the same wells, can help determine which type of Previous HitresistivityNext Hit data is appropriate for future wells in an area. However, borehole conditions, deviation angles, and economic considerations are also major factors in deciding which type of Previous HitresistivityTop instrument to use.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Protected Document: $10
Internal PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24