About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Indonesian Petroleum Association

Abstract


Indonesian Petroleum Association (IPA)
Vol. 49 (2025), No. 1 (May), Pages 1-17

PREDICTING LITHO-FACIES FROM Previous HitSEISMICNext Hit DATA: A MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH ON Previous HitSEISMICNext Hit Previous HitATTRIBUTESNext Hit

Reza Nugraha, Galang Purnomo Adi, Depi Restiadi, and Luthfi Wira Wicaksana

* Institut Teknologi Bandung
** Pertamina Hulu Indonesia, PT.
*** Pertamina Hulu Energi, PT.

ABSTRACT

Determining litho-facies distribution is vital in reservoir characterization. It generally involves extensive analysis of well data and Previous HitseismicNext Hit data inversion. However, well logs analysis is limited to the well location and logs availability, while inversion is a very complex process that usually requires pre-stack Previous HitseismicNext Hit data, which is not always available. Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Previous HitattributesNext Hit can be easily extracted from any available Previous HitseismicNext Hit data and are very powerful in highlighting amplitude anomalies related to the elastic properties corresponding to lithologies, facies, and fluid contents. This study proposed methods for predicting Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitattributesNext Hit to litho-facies by applying machine learning algorithms.

Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Previous HitattributesNext Hit are trained on four machine learning algorithms, namely, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting Tree (GTB), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Data used in this study consisted of Previous HitseismicNext Hit and well data from the Volve Field. Litho-facies interpretations are used as labels to train pseudo-wells of composite Previous HitseismicNext Hit traces. Additionally, AVO Previous HitattributesNext Hit are used for litho-facies prediction since partial stacks are available in the dataset.

The resulting models performed with generally high accuracies. It was found that the sampling rate of litho-facies logs, Previous HitattributesNext Hit selection, training intervals selection, and training sample size significantly affected the model result. Finally, the resulting models are used to predict the litho-facies distribution across several Previous HitseismicNext Hit slices, where they predicted geologically consistent sand distributions within the Volve’s field Previous HitgeologicalTop setting. For further improvements, more robust training datasets are needed for the model to increase prediction accuracy for each litho-facies.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $16
Open PDF Document: $28