About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Pacific Section of AAPG


The Geologic Transition, High Plateaus to Great Basin - A Symposium and Field Guide (The Mackin Volume), 2001
Pages 425-425

Lithospheric Architecture of the Colorado Plateau and Its Margins: Abstract

G. Randy Keller


Because of its tectonic significance, the lithosphere of the Colorado Plateau and its margins has been the subject of much recent debate and interest. On the Plateau itself, recent seismic results present conflicting values for Previous HitcrustalNext Hit thickness. Some of this variation probably reflects actual complexities in Previous HitcrustalNext Hit Previous HitstructureNext Hit. However, some of these results suggest the presence of a high-velocity (>7.0 km/s) layer at the base of the crust. A variety of technical and physical considerations make such a layer hard to detect unless it is ~10 km thick. Our group has used receiver function analysis to determine Previous HitcrustalNext Hit thickness and Vp/Vs ratio estimates for the southern Colorado Plateau based on the analysis of teleseismic P-waves recorded at Canyon de Chelly National Monument, Arizona and at Chaco Culture National Historic Park, New Mexico. These new data were combined with seismic refraction and gravity data in an integrated analysis of lithospheric Previous HitstructureNext Hit. The receiver functions were stacked together in clusters of similar back azimuths and epicentral distances. Using Previous HitcrustalNext Hit velocity values from previous studies as constraints, the receiver functions from the two stations suggest an upper Previous HitcrustalNext Hit layer approximately 24 km thick with a Vp/Vs ratio of 1.85 (which corresponds to a Poisson’s ratio of 0.29). The lower crust is about 23 km thick with a Vp/Vs ratio of 1.88 (corresponding to a Poisson’s ratio of 0.3). The thickness for the whole crust is approximately 47 km. Although errors in this number may be as large as +/- 5 km, this result supports arguments based on seismic reflection and refraction data for a thick crust (45–50 km) for the Colorado Plateau, and for a crust that is more mafic in composition than typical continental crust. Based on buoyancy arguments, gravity data in the region agree with seismic results and suggest that no major variations in Previous HitcrustalNext Hit thickness occur across the southern plateau. This Previous HitcrustalNext Hit Previous HitstructureNext Hit is in fact very similar to that of the Great Plains in eastern New Mexico, which is an area that shares many of the geologic characteristics of the Plateau. The Basin and Range province has also been the target of several recent seismic experiments. The results from the SSCD, DELTA FORCE, and PACE experiments in the Basin and Range province of southern Nevada, California, and western Arizona show that while the Previous HitcrustalNext Hit thickness is surprisingly uniform, there are some intriguing variations. The velocity models derived from these experiments coupled with analysis of gravity data reveal some intracrustal features that can be correlated with extensional regimes. In particular, the lower crust in the seismic models thickens in regions where extension is greater. The regions with thickened lower crust also correlate with long wavelength gravity highs. These results suggest that the mechanism for maintaining Previous HitcrustalNext Hit thickness during extension can be either magmatic underplating or lower Previous HitcrustalNext Hit flow or a combination of these processes. The margins of the plateau are associated with a variety of lithospheric structures. The Wasatch Front margin is particularly interesting and can be interpreted as a “rift within a rift” because of its velocity Previous HitstructureNext Hit and the abrupt transition in Previous HitcrustalNext Hit thickness into the Plateau. The southwestern and eastern margins are more gradual in terms of variations in Previous HitcrustalTop thickness but both have strong reflectors in the lithospheric mantle. These reflectors can be interpreted to lie at or near the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary.


Copyright © 2009 by AAPG Pacific Section and Utah Geological Society