About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists

Abstract


The Paradox Basin Revisited – New Developments in Petroleum Systems and Basin Analysis, 2009
Pages 178-197

Late Pennsylvanian and Early Permian Structural Geology and Tectonic History of the Paradox Basin and Uncompahgre Previous HitUpliftNext Hit, Colorado and Utah

Charles F. Kluth, Harvey R. DuChene

Abstract

The Uncompahgre Previous HitUpliftNext Hit and Paradox Basin are large, intraplate structures that formed in late Paleozoic time as part of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains. The subsurface data indicates that published interpretations of the development of these structures should be revised. The data show that the geometry of the Uncompahgre front to the SE from the Utah/Colorado state line contrasts to the single large fault in Utah, and is a stack of SW directed thrust faulted basement blocks that also carry Mississippian and older, pre-Previous HitsaltNext Hit rocks. Distribution of synorogenic sediments was largely by axial river systems and post dates the deposition of the Paradox Previous HitSaltNext Hit and the more uniform thickness, post-Previous HitsaltNext Hit, but pre-growth strata. The growth strata geometry record the development of accommodation space, and moving of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit due to differential loading. the loading by the sediments caused the underlying, mobile Previous HitsaltNext Hit to move into Previous HitsaltNext Hit walls that nucleated on earlier, fault-caused, basement topography. The Previous HitsaltNext Hit walls grew by a process called ‘downbuilding’ due to the differential loading and some Previous HitsaltNext Hit was at the surface during the entire growth history of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit wall. The development of accommodation space for each mini-basin between Previous HitsaltNext Hit walls ended when the pre-Previous HitsaltNext Hit and post-Previous HitsaltNext Hit sections welded together as the last of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit moved from beneath parts of the basin and closed Previous HitsaltNext Hit movement pathways. The locus of deposition then shifted to the SW, farther away from the Uncompahgre front, and a younger Previous HitsaltNext Hit wall and mini-basin formed. This process was repeated several times and resulted in a younging of the Previous HitsaltNext Hit walls toward the SW. The coarse alluvial fan material was preserved and prograded away from the mountain front only after the locus of deposition moved to the SW and axial rivers no longer redistributed the erosional debris. The new Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit of the geometry and timing of the Uncompahgre Previous HitUpliftNext Hit suggests that the Paradox salts and the Eagle Valley Evaporites were deposited in a continuous basin that existed at times across the site of the later Uncompahgre Previous HitUpliftTop.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24