About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Journal of Sedimentary Research (SEPM)

Abstract


Journal of Sedimentary Research
Vol. 82 (2012), No. 4. (April), Pages 216-231
Research Article

Mixed Siliciclastic–Previous HitCarbonateNext Hit Upward-Deepening Previous HitCyclesNext Hit of the Upper Cambrian Inner Detrital Belt of Laurentia

Paul M. Myrow, John F. Taylor, Anthony C. Runkel, Robert L. Ripperdan

Abstract

High-resolution sedimentological and biostratigraphic data recently recovered from Upper Cambrian strata in the northern Rocky Mountain and central Appalachian regions reveal that meter-scale Previous HitcyclesNext Hit of very different character developed synchronously during deposition of the basal subzones of the Ibexian Series in both the Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit facies belt and the distal part of the inner detrital, mixed siliciclastic–Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit facies belt of the Laurentian paleocontinent. A typical mixed siliciclastic–Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit cycle in the Snowy Range Formation of Wyoming and Montana consists of the following lithofacies in ascending order: shale, shale with very thin grainstone interbeds, grainstone with subordinate thin shale interbeds, flat-pebble conglomerate, and (in some Previous HitcyclesNext Hit) thrombolitic bioherms. Internal transitions between the constituent lithofacies are mostly gradational, but cycle boundaries are sharp with shale directly overlying flat-pebble conglomerate and/or thrombolitic boundstone. We postulate that these mixed siliciclastic–Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit Previous HitcyclesNext Hit developed in response to different depositional dynamics than meter-scale Previous HitcyclesNext Hit developed in Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit-belt facies. Specifically, Previous HitcyclesNext Hit in the Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit belt were produced largely by temporal variation in accommodation space, and associated filling of that space through progradation of the Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit system and aggradation to Previous HitseaNext Hit Previous HitlevelNext Hit. In contrast, cyclic deposition within the inner detrital belt was controlled by variations in terrigenous sediment input and resulting effects on Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit productivity. In this case, enhanced delivery of siliciclastic mud by rivers was triggered by regression and/or a shift to more humid climatic conditions. An upward increase of Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit in the main part of the Previous HitcyclesNext Hit reflects enhanced Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit production in response to the reduction of terrigenous clay supply during shoreline retreat. Widespread cementation of fine grainstone substrates led to deposition of extensive beds of flat-pebble conglomerate, possibly in association with elevated Previous HitseaNext Hit-surface temperatures and enhanced storm intensity. Thrombolites formed at times of maximum transgression as microbial communities thrived in the absence of turbidity, colonizing the irregular surfaces of flat-pebble conglomerate beds. We thus interpret these wholly subtidal Previous HitcyclesNext Hit to record full changes in paleobathymetry with the bulk of the Previous HitcyclesNext Hit recording upward deepening, rather than shoaling associated with regression. Comparison with age-equivalent shoaling Previous HitcyclesNext Hit of the Conococheague Formation of the Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit belt of the Appalachian Mountains highlights the different depositional dynamics in the mixed siliciclastic–Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit systems, and underscores the peril in extrapolation of depositional models derived from Previous HitcarbonateTop systems to mixed systems, regardless of age or paleogeographic setting.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $16
Open PDF Document: $28