About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Journal of Sedimentary Research (SEPM)

Abstract


Journal of Sedimentary Research
Vol. 88 (2018), No. 1. (January), Pages 148-176
DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2017.73

Back To Basics of Previous HitSequenceNext Hit Stratigraphy: Early Miocene and Mid-cretaceous Examples from the New Jersey Paleoshelf

Kenneth G. Miller, Christopher J. Lombardi, James V. Browning, William J. Schmelz, Gabriel Gallegos, Gregory S. Mountain, Kimberly E. Baldwin

Abstract

Many Previous HitsequenceNext Hit stratigraphic approaches have used relative sea-level curves that are dependent on models or preconceived notions to recognize depositional sequences, key stratal surfaces, and systems tracts, leading to contradictory interpretations. Here, we urge following basic Previous HitsequenceNext Hit stratigraphic principles independent of sea-level curves using seismic terminations, facies successions and stacking patterns from Previous HitwellNext Hit logs and sections, and chronostratigraphic data to recognize Previous HitsequenceNext Hit boundaries, other stratal surfaces, parasequences, and systems tracts. We provide examples from the New Jersey siliciclastic paleoshelf from the: 1) early Miocene using academic-based chronostratigraphic, seismic, core, downhole, and core Previous HitlogNext Hit data, and 2) mid-Cretaceous using commercial Previous HitwellNext Hit-Previous HitlogNext Hit, seismic, and biostratigraphic data. We use classic criteria to identify Previous HitsequenceNext Hit boundaries on seismic profiles by reflection terminations (onlap, downlap, erosional truncation, and toplap), in cores by surfaces of erosion associated with hiatuses detected using biostratigraphy and Sr-isotope stratigraphy and changes in stacking patterns, and in logs by changes in stacking patterns. Maximum flooding surfaces (MFSs) are major seismic downlap surfaces associated with changes from retrogradational to progradational parasequence stacking patterns. Systems tracts are identified by their bounding surfaces and fining- (generally deepening) and coarsening- (generally shallowing) upward trends in cores and Previous HitwellNext Hit-Previous HitlogNext Hit stacking patterns. Our Miocene examples of sequences m5.4 (17.7–16.1 Ma) and m5.8 (20.1–19.2 Ma) illustrate how basic Previous HitsequenceNext Hit stratigraphic techniques reveal higher-order sequences within Myr scale composite sequences. Our mid-Cretaceous examples from the New Jersey shelf provide a paleoshelf transect spanning the Great Stone Dome to the outer continental shelf to identify parasequences, sequences, and systems tracts. This Previous HitsequenceNext Hit stratigraphic framework provides insights into Myr scale coeval depositional environments across the paleoshelf and reservoir continuity, and highlights the application of basic Previous HitsequenceTop stratigraphic criteria to reservoir-scale evaluation, not only for oil and gas resources, but also for carbon storage.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24