About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Journal of Sedimentary Research (SEPM)

Abstract


Journal of Sedimentary Research, Section B: Stratigraphy and Global Studies
Vol. 68 (1998), No. 2. (March), Pages 283-298

Quantitative Controls on Location and Architecture of Carbonate Depositional Sequences: Upper Miocene, Cabo De Gata Region, Se Spain

Evan K. Franseen (1), Robert H. Goldstein (2), Mark R. Farr (2)

ABSTRACT

Sequence stratigraphy, pinning-point relative Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit curves, and magnetostratigraphy provide the quantitative data necessary to understand how rates of Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit change and different substrate paleoslopes are dominant controls on accumulation rate, carbonate depositional sequence location, and internal architecture. Five third-order (1-10 my) and fourth-order (0.1-1.0 my) upper Miocene carbonate depositional sequences (DS1A, DS1B, DS2, DS3, TCC) formed with superimposed higher-frequency Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit cycles in an archipelago setting in SE Spain.

Overall, our study indicates when areas of high substrate slope (> 15°) are in shallow water, independent of climate, the location and internal architecture of carbonate deposits are not directly linked to Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit position but, instead, are controlled by location of gently sloping substrates and processes of bypass. In contrast, if carbonate sediments are generated where substrates of low slope (< 15° in our area) are in shallow water, then architecture and location of deposits may be more directly controlled by the relative position of Previous HitseaNext Hit Previous HitlevelNext Hit. For these Previous HitsystemsNext Hit, the rates of relative Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit change are important for determining which Previous HitsystemsNext Hit Previous HittractsNext Hit develop.

DS1A-DS1B, cooler-water ramps, result from sediment bypass across steep paleoslopes to toes of slopes. Accumulation rates decreased from > 15.6 cm/ky to ~ 2 cm/ky and overall relative Previous HitseaNext Hit Previous HitlevelNext Hit rose at rates of 17-21.4 cm/ky. Higher frequency Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit rates were about 111 to more than 260 cm/ky, producing onlapping, fining- (deepening-) upward cycles. Decreasing accumulation rates resulted from decreasing surface area for shallow-water sediment production, drowning of shallow-water substrates, and complex sediment dispersal related to the archipelago setting. Typical Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract and parasequence development should not be expected in "bypass ramp" settings; facies of onlapping strata do not track base Previous HitlevelNext Hit and are likely to be significantly different compared to onlapping strata associated with coastal onlap.

Basal and upper DS2 reef megabreccias (indicating the transition from cool to warmer climatic conditions) were eroded from steep upslope positions and redeposited downslope onto areas of gentle substrate during rapid Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit falls (> 22.7 cm/ky) of short duration. Such rapid Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit falls and presence of steep slopes are not conducive to formation of forced regressive Previous HitsystemsNext Hit Previous HittractsNext Hit composed of downstepping reef clinoforms.

The DS3 reefal platform formed where shallow water coincided with gently sloping substrates created by earlier deposition. Slow progradation (0.39-1.45 km/my) is best explained by the lack of an extensive bank top, progressively falling Previous HitseaNext Hit Previous HitlevelNext Hit, and low productivity resulting from siliciclastic debris and excess nutrients shed from nearby volcanic islands. Although DS3 strata were deposited during a third-order relative Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit Previous HitcycleNext Hit, a typical transgressive Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract is not recognizable, indicating that the initial relative rise in Previous HitseaNext Hit Previous HitlevelNext Hit was too rapid (>> 19 cm/ky). Downstepping reefs, forming a forced regressive Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract, were deposited during the relative Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit fall at the end of DS3, indicating that relatively slow rates of fall (10 cm/ky or less) over favorable paleoslope conditions are conducive to generation of forced regressive Previous HitsystemsNext Hit Previous HittractsNext Hit consisting of downstepping reef clinoforms.

The TCC sequence consists of four shallow-water sedimentary cycles that were deposited during a 400 ky to 100 ky time span. Such shallow-water cycles, typical of many platforms, form only where shallow water intersects gently sloping substrates. The relative thicknesses of cycles (< 2 m to 15 m thick), magnitudes of relative Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit fluctuations associated with each Previous HitcycleNext Hit (25-30 m), high rates of relative Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit fluctuations (minimum of 25-120 cm/ky), and the widespread distribution of similar TCC cycles in the Mediterranean and elsewhere are supportive of a glacio-eustatic influence. With rates of Previous HitseaNext Hit-Previous HitlevelNext Hit change so high, typical Previous HitsystemsNext Hit Previous HittractsTop do not form.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24