About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

Journal of Sedimentary Research (SEPM)

Abstract


Journal of Sedimentary Research, Section A: Sedimentary Petrology and Processes
Vol. 70 (2000), No. 1. (January), Pages 64-83

Gravity-Driven Consolidation of Granular Slurries--Implications for Debris-Previous HitFlowNext Hit Deposition and Deposit Characteristics

Jon J. Major

ABSTRACT

Fresh debris-Previous HitflowNext Hit deposits consolidate under their own weight. How quickly they consolidate (dissipate excess pore-Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressure and compact) affects their resistance to remobilization as well as their sedimentologic and stratigraphic characteristics. Here, analysis of small-volume (sim.jpg0.05 m3) noncohesive debris-Previous HitflowNext Hit slurries and larger (sim.jpg10 m3) experimental debris-Previous HitflowNext Hit deposits reveals the nature, rate, and magnitude of consolidation of typical debris-Previous HitflowNext Hit deposits.

A simple, linear, one-dimensional model describing the diffusion of excess pore-Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressure satisfactorily approximates the overall timing and magnitude of consolidation of noncohesive debris-Previous HitflowNext Hit deposits. The model and measurements of pore-Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressure demonstrate that changes in Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressure and effective stress evolve upward from the base of a deposit, and show that hydraulic diffusivities of muddy slurries containing about 5 to 50 wt% mud are remarkably similar, about 10-6-10-7 m2/s. By comparison, sandy-gravel debris-Previous HitflowNext Hit deposits containing <2 wt% mud have higher hydraulic diffusivities, sim.jpg10-4 m2/s. Pore-Previous HitfluidNext Hit seepage across a permeable basal boundary accelerates consolidation response time in the lower stratum compared to that over a no-Previous HitflowNext Hit boundary. However, changes in sediment fabric resulting from porosity changes alter hydraulic properties of basal debris and retard expected decay of Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressure immediately above the bed. This result suggests that Previous HitfluidNext Hit infiltration to the substrate does not contribute significantly toward debris-Previous HitflowNext Hit deposition.

Low hydraulic diffusivities promote high and persistent pore-Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressure in debris flows, key factors enhancing mobilization. Elsewhere, pore-Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressures nearly sufficient to liquefy debris have been shown to persist through transit and deposition. Here, I show that significant dissipation of such Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressure is restricted to postdepositional consolidation. Therefore, neither uniform decay of excess pore-Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressure nor intrinsic viscoplastic yield strength explain debris-Previous HitflowNext Hit deposition. Instead, debris-Previous HitflowNext Hit deposition results from friction concentrated along Previous HitflowNext Hit margins where high pore-Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressures are absent. Sustained high pore-Previous HitfluidNext Hit pressure following deposition fosters deposit remobilization, which can mute or obliterate stratigraphic evidence for multiple events. A thick deposit of homogeneous, poorly sorted debris can result from mingling of soft deposits and recurrent surges rather than from a single Previous HitflowTop wave if deposit consolidation time greatly exceeds typical sediment emplacement times.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24