About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
van Riel P., P. Mesdag, H. Debeye, and M. Sams,
seismic
data
into geostatistical reservoir modeling, in T. C. Coburn, J. M. Yarus, and R. L. Chambers, eds., Stochastic modeling and geostatistics: Principles, methods, and case studies, volume II: AAPG Computer Applications in Geology 5, p.
DOI:10.1306/1063817CA53236
Full Integration of
Seismic
Data
into Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling
Seismic
Data
into Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling
P. van Riel,1 P. Mesdag,2 H. Debeye,3 M. Sams4
1Fugro-Jason Netherlands BV Leid Schendam, Netherlands
2Fugro-Jason Netherlands BV Leid Schendam, Netherlands
3Fugro-Jason Netherlands BV Leid Schendam, Netherlands
4Fugro-Jason Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
ABSTRACT
Seismic
reflection amplitude
data
are increasingly used in reservoir modeling to provide information on changes in earth properties away from well locations. In geostatistical reservoir modeling, the most common application is to use
seismic
data
as background
data
in some form of comodeling.
Seismic
data
image reflectors and not earth layer properties. Therefore, prior to use in comodeling,
seismic
data
must first be transformed into an earth layer property. Typically, the transform is to acoustic impedance using an appropriate
seismic
inversion
method.
Seismic
inversion
methods generate results that are generally band limited in nature, resulting in limits to vertical resolution. The vertical resolution achieved can be an order of magnitude below the vertical model resolution required from geostatistical reservoir modeling, which is in the order of well-log resolution. Hence, in using
seismic
data
, geostatistical modelers encounter a problem of downscaling, not the more commonly encountered upscaling problem. This difference in scale introduces scatter between the primary
data
with well-log order resolution and the secondary seismically derived rock property
data
used in the comodeling. As a result, to preserve vertical heterogeneity, only limited use of the secondary
data
can be made in comodeling procedures. This results in models that only partially fit the
seismic
data
, i.e., only limited use is made of the
seismic
information. If the secondary
data
are more strongly imposed, the fit to the
seismic
data
improves, but the required vertical heterogeneity is not preserved. The inability to overcome this difference in scale issue, therefore, limits the value of the application of comodeling methods to integrate
seismic
data
into reservoir models.
One class of geostatistical methods that overcomes this limitation relies on iterative geostatistical modeling. In these methods, referred to as geostatistical
seismic
inversion
, the iterative modeling process is conditioned such that the final models generated closely match the
seismic
data
while maintaining the required vertical heterogeneity. The application of these methods is computationally expensive relative to comodeling methods but is now practical for large models on today's desktop hardware. Relative to comodeling, geostatistical
seismic
inversion
methods make full use of the information carried in the
seismic
data
, resulting in a significant reduction in model uncertainty away from well control.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |