About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
Patterson, P. E., T. A. Jones, A. D. Donovan, J. D. Ottmann, and C. J. Donofrio, modeling
of a braided-stream depositional system, in T. C. Coburn, J. M. Yarus, and R. L. Chambers, eds., Stochastic
modeling
and geostatistics: Principles, methods, and case studies, volume II: AAPG Computer Applications in Geology 5, p.
DOI:10.1306/1063818CA53237
Hierarchical Description and Geologic
Modeling
of a Braided-stream Depositional System
![Previous Hit](/data/images/arrow_left.gif)
![Next Hit](/data/images/arrow_right.gif)
P. E. Patterson,1 T. A. Jones,2 A. D. Donovan,3 J. D. Ottmann,4 C. J. Donofrio5
1ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
2ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
3ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company Houston, Texas, U.S.A.; present address: BP Upstream Technology, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
4ExxonMobil Exploration Company Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
5ExxonMobil Exploration Company Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge the efforts and dedication of Trond Skjerven and Frode Viste of Roxar asa. in development of the bar-train code. We also thank Gordon Moir and AAPG reviewers James Jennings, Jeffrey May, and Alister MacDonald for suggestions that improved the manuscript.
ABSTRACT
The facies architecture, sequence-stratigraphic framework, and structural configuration of a petroleum reservoir were delineated by an integrated study. These interpretations formed the basis of three-dimensional (3-D) geologic models that were constructed for estimation of reserves, flow-simulation studies, and field-development planning. The study incorporated 3-D seismic
interpretations, well-log correlations, facies and petrophysical analyses of cored intervals, and interpretations derived from outcrop exposures of the reservoir.
The reservoir intervals are interpreted to represent a fluvial depositional system that varies systematically along an updip to downdip transect. Proximal (updip) fluvial-facies deposits are inferred to represent amalgamated channel complexes that form widespread sheets. Medial fluvial-facies deposits are interpreted as amalgamated to semiamalgamated braid-bar deposits that are thinner and less laterally persistent. Distal (downdip) fluvial facies are inferred to represent thin yet laterally extensive braid-bar deposits.
Object-based modeling
techniques were used to model the internal architecture of the reservoir intervals. Proximal channel facies were generated using standard software to populate the zones with channel elements that are clustered to form channel complexes. Medial and distal bar facies, however, required an innovative method that populates the zones with discrete, user-defined, braid-bar elements that are distributed along thalwegs. Clusters of thalwegs form amalgamated to semiamalgamated bar complexes. This capability, referred to as bar-train
modeling
, results in a better computer-model representation of the fluvial-sandstone bar geometry and spatial distribution.
The resulting geologic models provide an improved reservoir characterization of the large-scale and small-scale fluvial architecture for the subsurface reservoir. In particular, the geologic models more accurately describe the complex architecture of the lowstand channel and braid-bar fluvial sandstones as well as the internal architecture of the intervening mudstone deposits.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |