About This Item
- Full text of this item is not available.
- Abstract PDFAbstract PDF(no subscription required)
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
Oil
Generation and Migration in the Gulf of Mexico Slope
By
Originally presented at the 1998 Hedberg (AAPG) Research Conference at Galveston, TX
Book/CD-ROM Title:
Edited by Robert Shoup, Joel Watkins, John Karlo, and Dave Hall
oil
-prone source rocks ranging in age from Early
Tertiary to Late Jurassic, a regionally variable thermal
history
, rapid vertical migration
along salt and faults and extremely low trapping efficiency. The low trapping efficiency
of the Gulf slope is often offset by extremely prolific Upper Jurassic source rocks with a
relatively recent time of hydrocarbon charge.
Episodes of sediment loading and structural evolution cause
pulsed migration from depth. Traps often receive multiple charges with variable
hydrocarbon characteristics, and hydrocarbons undergo fractionation and remigration during
structural modification within complex reservoir systems. Most hydrocarbons are eventually
dispersed, or lost to the sea floor. For this reason,
oil
and gas seeps, gas hydrates,
chemosynthetic communities, authigenic carbonate rock, and natural
oil
slicks are common
across some areas of the slope. Regionally, the distribution of seeps shows a strong
relation to the distribution of subsurface accumulations of
oil
and gas.
Within the main zones of seepage across the Gulf continental slope and shelf edge, seepage characteristics are related to structural context. Conduits for hydrocarbon migration are sometimes resolvable from depth to the sea floor on seismic profiles. Sites of seepage are definable using 3-D geophysics as sea-floor amplitudes associated with subsurface structure and irregular sea floor.
Seepage intensity in the vicinity of
oil
and gas
accumulations is strongly controlled by structure. For example, salt movement and faulting
on the edges of intrasalt basins with large source-rock drainage areas can result in
significant
oil
and gas seepage with sea-floor modification. Examples include seeps near
(1) Cooper Field on Garden Banks Block 388, (2) Jolliet Field, Green Canyon Block 184, (3)
Mars Field in Mississippi Canyon Block 807, and (4) the "Venus" seep, a regional
pressure release point representing lateral fluid flow from the vicinity of Ursa Field on
Mississippi Canyon Block 810.
High-rise salt structures that have received charge can
display extremely prolific seepage. The
oil
and gas seeps at Garden Banks Block 425, near
Auger Field, serve as an example. The nature of seepage associated with sub-salt
discoveries was initially unknown. However, horizontal salt sheets with sub-salt charge
display edge-leakage, but more intense seepage can occur on the fractured crests of salt
sheets. Thus, seeps overly some sub-salt fields. The deep Sigsbee Escarpment area also is
characterized by
oil
and gas seeps, one example being near the BAHA well in Alaminos
Canyon Block 600.
In contrast, a charged stratigraphic trap with poorly
developed vertical conduits to the sea floor might at best display a modest
oil
seepage
signature deficient in thermogenic gas. The easily detectable aromatic hydrocarbons of
crude
oil
(PAH) accumulate over time in sea-floor sediments because they are resistant to
bacterial oxidation, whereas gas is rapidly removed by bacterial oxidation.
Seep geochemistry allows mapping of
oil
families ahead of
the drill bit, emphasizing differences in resource value. Lower Tertiary and Cretaceous
source rocks are important in specific areas, but Upper Jurassic source rocks are
initially characterized by high sulfur contents which decrease with increasing thermal
exposure. In the broadest sense, biomarker geochemistry of
oil
seeps can provide regional
calibration in mapping source rock maturity and timing.
Although
oil
and gas seeps constrain risk, seeps do not
guarantee success because so many other risk factors are involved. In addition,
gas-flushing sometimes creates
oil
seeps in association with gas fields. Prolific leakage,
however, should not raise undue concern of breached seals. In contrast, the absence of
seeps on the slope where potential migration conduits do exist could indicate a lack of
charge, so other risk factors become moot.
The relationship between seepage and subsurface
accumulations on the Gulf slope appears similar to some other
oil
-prone Tertiary deltas in
terms of seepage (i.e., offshore Nigeria). However, it should be stressed that other
hydrocarbon-prone basins can display quite different characteristics.
