About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
Meckel, L. D., and M. R. Thomasson,
gas
sandstone reservoirs: An overview, in S. P. Cumella, K. W. Shanley, and W. K. Camp, eds., Understanding, exploring, and developing tight-
gas
sands—2005 Vail Hedberg Conference: AAPG Hedberg Series, no. 3, p.
DOI:10.1306/13131047H33321
2008. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.
Pervasive Tight-
gas
Sandstone Reservoirs: An Overview
gas
Sandstone Reservoirs: An Overview
Lawrence D. Meckel,1 M. Ray Thomasson2
1L. D. Meckel and Company, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.
2Thomasson Partner Associates, Inc., Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge the very helpful comments and suggestions provided by the reviewers, Wayne Camp, John Horne, Ben Law, and Fred Meissner. We also thank various colleagues who provided additional insights and observations: Dick Bishop, Duff Kerr, Ben Law, Tim Schowalter, Matt Silverman, and John T. Smith. We also thank Kirstin Sulzberger and Jeannie Straw for the preparation of the chapter and Janet Tyrrell-Ead for the preparation of the figures.
ABSTRACT
The objectives of this chapter are threefold: (1) to provide a historical perspective on considerations of pervasive tight-
gas
accumulations, (2) to provide some observations on the present understanding of these accumulations, and (3) to anticipate where the industry is headed in the future.
From 1979 to about 1987, various workers (industry, government, and academe) discussed pervasive tight-
gas
accumulations and established important relationships for source rock, maturity, expulsion and migration, pressures, rock quality, and fluid content. Their main conclusion was that the hydrocarbons in these reservoir systems were dynamic and not static as in conventional structural and stratigraphic traps. The paradigm shift made by 1987 concluded that these accumulations were continually adjusting to existing conditions in both time and space. In more recent years, additional examples have been documented, and questions have arisen about the validity of the original model, noting the presence of more water in some systems than the model would predict.
The close proximity of the mature,
gas
-generating, and
gas
-expelling source rock to the reservoirs is critical. The amount and richness of mature source rock has to be adequate for the volume of reservoir rock being charged. The proper combination of these circumstances produces more
gas
than can be contained under normal pressure. The quantity of this
gas
charge relative to available pore space in the reservoir system will dictate the reservoir pressure.
Pervasive tight-
gas
accumulations have now been documented in more than 20 North American basins and are the targets for major ongoing exploration and
development
programs. The average reservoir porosity for these producing units is in the 8–9% range, with average in-situ permeabilities of hundredths of a millidarcy.
We believe the industry will likely move forward in four directions: (1) revisit older mature basins, (2) expand into new basins, (3) move into carbonate reservoirs, and (4) continue to develop tighter and tighter rock. With continuing technology improvements (especially in drilling and completing) and robust
gas
prices, the industry will access vast new reserves farther down into the resource pyramid.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |