About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Warpinski, N. R., and J. C. Lorenz, 2008, Analysis of the multiwell experiment data and results: Implications for the basin-centered gas Previous HitmodelNext Hit, in S. P. Cumella, K. W. Shanley, and W. K. Camp, eds., Understanding, exploring, and developing tight-gas sands—2005 Vail Hedberg Conference: AAPG Hedberg Series, no. 3, p. 157-176.

DOI:10.1306/13131055H33325

Copyright copy2008. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

Analysis of the Multiwell Experiment Data and Results: Implications for the Basin-centered Gas Previous HitModelNext Hit

Norman R. Warpinski,1 John C. Lorenz2

1Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.A.; Present address: Pinnacle Technologies, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
2Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.A.; Present address: Geoflight, LLC, Edgewood, New Mexico, U.S.A.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge and thank the many participants in the Multiwell Experiment (MWX), Slant-Hole Completion Test (SHCT), and M-Site programs who helped perform the large body of work on which this chapter is based. This manuscript has benefited significantly from reviews, discussions, and insights provided by Steve Cumella and Steve Leeds, and it has been technically reviewed by Chuck Kluth and Steve Laubach. The MWX and SHCT programs were funded by the U.S. Department of Energy; the M-Site program was cofunded by the Gas Research Institute (now the Gas Technology Institute) and the U.S. Department of Energy.

ABSTRACT

Extensive testing, measurement, and data collection at the Multiwell Experiment (MWX) field test site in northwestern Colorado characterize low-permeability gas-bearing sandstone reservoirs in the 1220-m (4000-ft)-thick Mesaverde Formation in the Piceance Basin and can be used to understand such reservoirs elsewhere in the Rocky Mountain region. These data show that although there is little change in porosity with depth, permeability is degraded by the increasing water saturations near the top of the gas-bearing section. Confining stress and pore pressure also combine to reduce permeability, with the result that conventional laboratory measurements on cores overestimate the actual matrix permeability. However, restored-state laboratory permeability measurements seriously underestimate the system permeability, as measured by well tests, because the system permeability is dominated by natural fractures. Both matrix permeability and fracture permeability are also sensitive to changes in stress: increased confining stress or decreased pore pressure (or both) during production decreases the system permeability by several orders of magnitude because of closure of fracture apertures and intergranular pores. Natural fractures cause horizontal permeability anisotropies of up to 100:1, measured by carefully controlled well testing, with the long axis oriented parallel to the dominant fracture trend and to the maximum horizontal compressive stress orientation. This fracture permeability system is susceptible to damage by stimulation fluids. Calculations of pore pressure based on drilling mud weights underestimate measured formation pressures. The system is overpressured at 18.1 kPa/m (0.8 psi/ft), but by only 12 kPa/m (0.53 psi/ft) if local topography is considered. Coals in the section are barriers to heat flow, causing a stepped geothermal gradient. Although collected in the early 1980s, these data comprise what is perhaps the most comprehensive and mutually supporting suite of geological and engineering data from a single site and strongly support the basin-centered gas Previous HitmodelTop at this location.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24