About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Chapter from:
AAPG Memoir 67: Seals, Traps, and the Petroleum System, Edited by R. C. Surdam
(Publication Subject: Previous HitOilNext Hit Methodology, Concepts)
AAPG Memoir 67: Seals, Traps, and the Petroleum System. Chapter 5: Seal Strength vs. Trap Closure--A Fundamental Control on the Distribution of Previous HitOilNext Hit and Previous HitGasNext Hit, by John K. Sales, p. 57-83

Copyright © 1997 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.


Chapter 5

Seal Strength vs. Trap Closure--A Fundamental Control on the Distribution of Previous HitOilNext Hit and Previous HitGasNext Hit

by

John K. Sales1
Mobil Previous HitOilNext Hit Corporation (retired), U.S.A.
1Currently at RR-1, Box 197, Cabot, Vermont, 05647

ABSTRACT

Prediction of hydrocarbons ahead of the drill is our highest goal. Every factor relating to it has been studied extensively, except the role that traps play. I suggest that this role is important, and in some cases pivotal. Traps act as "valves," controlling what they retain, leak, and spill. Closure (vertical distance between spillpoint and top of the trap) vs. seal strength (height of the hydrocarbon column the seal can retain before leaking) controls this. Three classes of trap are essential to cover the possibilities. Two key hydrocarbon columns are used as thresholds for the classification: the highest possible Previous HitgasNext Hit column and the highest possible total column the seal of the trap will allow. The spillpoint may be above (class 1), below (class 3), or between (class 2) these two thresholds. The three classes distribute hydrocarbons differently. Class 1 traps spill rather than leak Previous HitgasNext Hit, finally spilling Previous HitoilNext Hit from the trap. Class 3 traps spill neither fluid, but accumulate Previous HitoilNext Hit until it balances seal strength; thereafter, Previous HitgasNext Hit plus excess Previous HitoilNext Hit leaks. Class 2 traps leak Previous HitgasNext Hit but spill Previous HitoilNext Hit, and have Previous HitgasNext Hit/Previous HitoilNext Hit contacts suspended in midtrap. The argument that Previous HitoilNext Hit has a lower interfacial angle and entry pressure applies only until leakage starts. Then Previous Hitgas'sNext Hit higher position, smaller molecules, and lower viscosity make it more mobile. Traps equilibrate based on this principle: full of Previous HitgasNext Hit (class 1), partly full of Previous HitoilNext Hit (class 3), or filled with a mixed charge (class 2).

To the extent that the best provinces are exposed to an excess of both fluids, this principle controls world distribution of Previous HitoilNext Hit and Previous HitgasNext Hit. More practically, in an economy-favoring Previous HitoilNext Hit, higher-class traps leak Previous HitgasNext Hit, preserving Previous HitoilNext Hit in themselves and traps updip. The trap class of a discovery has implications that may modify drilling sequence.

During uplift, class 1 traps may be Previous HitgasNext Hit-flushed and thus degrade. Class 3 traps should change minimally. Class 2 traps should vent additional, now more buoyant Previous HitgasNext Hit, and make more space for Previous HitoilNext Hit, improving their economics. A slightly different scenario applies if seal strength decreases during uplift.

In the North Sea, Gullfaks, Snorre, and most of the Ekofisk group of chalk anticlines are class 3, Oseberg is class 2, and Troll East, is class 1. Turner Valley in Alberta, which has a two-phase fill, perpetual Previous HitgasNext Hit flare, great closure, and

End page 5-57 ----------------

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $16
Open PDF Document: $28