About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Chapter from:
AAPG Memoir 67: Seals, Previous HitTrapsNext Hit, and the Petroleum System, Edited by R. C. Surdam
(Publication Subject: Oil Methodology, Concepts)
AAPG Memoir 67: Seals, Previous HitTrapsNext Hit, and the Petroleum System. Chapter 5: Seal Strength vs. Trap Closure--A Fundamental Control on the Distribution of Oil and Gas, by John K. Sales, p. 57-83

Copyright © 1997 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.


Chapter 5

Seal Strength vs. Trap Closure--A Fundamental Control on the Distribution of Oil and Gas

by

John K. Sales1
Mobil Oil Corporation (retired), U.S.A.
1Currently at RR-1, Box 197, Cabot, Vermont, 05647

ABSTRACT

Prediction of hydrocarbons ahead of the drill is our highest goal. Every factor Previous HitrelatingNext Hit to it has been studied extensively, except the role that Previous HittrapsNext Hit play. I suggest that this role is important, and in some cases pivotal. Previous HitTrapsNext Hit act as "valves," controlling what they retain, leak, and spill. Closure (vertical distance between spillpoint and top of the trap) vs. seal strength (height of the hydrocarbon column the seal can retain before leaking) controls this. Three classes of trap are essential to cover the possibilities. Two key hydrocarbon columns are used as thresholds for the classification: the highest possible gas column and the highest possible total column the seal of the trap will allow. The spillpoint may be above (class 1), below (class 3), or between (class 2) these two thresholds. The three classes distribute hydrocarbons differently. Class 1 Previous HittrapsNext Hit spill rather than leak gas, finally spilling oil from the trap. Class 3 Previous HittrapsNext Hit spill neither fluid, but accumulate oil until it balances seal strength; thereafter, gas plus excess oil leaks. Class 2 Previous HittrapsNext Hit leak gas but spill oil, and have gas/oil contacts suspended in midtrap. The argument that oil has a lower interfacial angle and entry pressure applies only until leakage starts. Then gas's higher position, smaller molecules, and lower viscosity make it more mobile. Previous HitTrapsNext Hit equilibrate based on this principle: full of gas (class 1), partly full of oil (class 3), or filled with a mixed charge (class 2).

To the extent that the best provinces are exposed to an excess of both fluids, this principle controls world distribution of oil and gas. More practically, in an economy-favoring oil, higher-class Previous HittrapsNext Hit leak gas, preserving oil in themselves and Previous HittrapsNext Hit updip. The trap class of a discovery has implications that may modify drilling sequence.

During uplift, class 1 Previous HittrapsNext Hit may be gas-flushed and thus degrade. Class 3 Previous HittrapsNext Hit should change minimally. Class 2 Previous HittrapsTop should vent additional, now more buoyant gas, and make more space for oil, improving their economics. A slightly different scenario applies if seal strength decreases during uplift.

In the North Sea, Gullfaks, Snorre, and most of the Ekofisk group of chalk anticlines are class 3, Oseberg is class 2, and Troll East, is class 1. Turner Valley in Alberta, which has a two-phase fill, perpetual gas flare, great closure, and

End page 5-57 ----------------

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $16
Open PDF Document: $28