About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Chapter from:
AAPG Memoir 67: Seals, Traps, and the Petroleum System, Edited by R. C. Surdam
(Publication Subject: Oil Methodology, Concepts)
AAPG Memoir 67: Seals, Traps, and the Petroleum System. Chapter 15: A Pore-Pressure Limit in Overpressured South Texas Oil and Gas Fields, by Terry Engelder and John T. Leftwich, Jr., Pages 255-267

Copyright © 1997 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.


Chapter 15

A Pore-Pressure Limit in Overpressured South Texas Oil and Gas Fields

Terry Engelder

The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

John T. Leftwich, Jr.

Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.A.

ABSTRACT

One way to simplify the characterization of pore pressure, Pp, in deep, overpressured basins is to divide oil and gas fields into stratified zones, based on average pressure-depth trends that are approximately linear. With this approximation, each zone is assigned a constant pressure-depth gradient. In the shallow portion of South Texas oil and gas fields (i.e., zone one), Pp has a hydrostatic gradient, whereas in the uppermost overpressured portions of these fields (i.e., zones two and three), Ppis characterized by gradients that exceed the lithostatic trend of 1 psi/ft (22.6 MPa/km) (Leftwich and Engelder, 1995). At greater depth (i.e., zone four), Pp increases along a gradient of about 0.9 psi/ft (20.3 MPa/km). The transition between zones three and four defines the depth at which Pp reaches a limit that is 85%-90% of the lithostatic (i.e., vertical) stress. Because a Pp gradient of ~0.9 psi/ft (20.3 MPa/km) is maintained throughout pressure zone FOUR in several South Texas fields, the Pp limit is a regional phenomenon. Two conditions leading to a Pp limit involve a cyclic leakage of pore fluid through zone FOUR. In both cases, leakage is governed by a balance between Pp and the minimum horizontal total stress, Sh. One condition favors leakage of pore fluid through zone FOUR upon the opening of existing joints or the propagation of new joints by natural hydraulic fracturing. The other condition favors leakage along faults following refracturing during slip events. The difference between these conditions is that leakage through joints can regulate Pp at a constant value through repeated cycles, whereas leakage by fault slip leads to an ever-increasing Pp as Sh increases through repeated cycles.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24