About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Nelson, Philip H., 2014, Fluid production characteristics in Pinedale and Jonah fields, in M. Longman, S. Kneller, T. Meyer, and M. Chapin, eds., Pinedale field: Case study of a giant tight Previous HitgasNext Hit sandstone reservoir: AAPG Memoir 107, p. 533547.

DOI:10.1306/13511900M1073327

15

Fluid Production Characteristics in Pinedale and Jonah Fields

Philip H. Nelson

U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected])

ABSTRACT

Previous HitGasNext Hit, oil, and water production Previous HitdataNext Hit were compiled for selected wells in Pinedale and Jonah fields, Wyoming, for the purpose of quantifying the fluid production from two tight Previous HitgasNext Hit systems. Production of Previous HitgasNext Hit, oil, and water from each well is represented by two samples taken five years apart, with the first sample typically taken two years after commencement of production. For each well, summary diagrams of oil versus Previous HitgasNext Hit and water versus Previous HitgasNext Hit production show fluid production rates, the change in rates after five years, the water-Previous HitgasNext Hit and oil-Previous HitgasNext Hit ratios, and the fluid type. These diagrams allow well-to-well and field-to-field comparisons. Fields producing water at low rates (with a lower limit based on water vapor in Previous HitgasNext Hit in the reservoir) can be distinguished from fields producing water at moderate or high rates, and the water–Previous HitgasNext Hit ratios are quantified.

Previous HitGasNext Hit production rates are higher in Jonah field than in Pinedale field at both the first and second samples, and the average Previous HitgasNext Hit production rate for the second sample is about half that of the first sample for both fields. Water production rates are generally substantially higher in Pinedale than in Jonah, and water–Previous HitgasNext Hit ratios in Pinedale are roughly a factor of ten greater in Pinedale than in Jonah. Previous HitGasNext Hit and water production rates for each field are fairly well grouped, indicating that Pinedale and Jonah fields behave as distinct but fairly cohesive Previous HitgasNext Hit–water systems. In particular, Pinedale field appears to be remarkably uniform in its flow behavior with time. Jonah field, although internally faulted, exhibits a small spread in first-sample production rates.

In all wells examined from the two fields, water production commenced with Previous HitgasNext Hit production—there are no examples of wells with water-free production and no examples where water production began after first-sample Previous HitgasNext Hit production. Water production rates declined in all wells in Pinedale field from the first to the second sample, whereas in Jonah field, half the wells showed increases and half showed decreases during the five-year period. Most wells had water–Previous HitgasNext Hit ratios exceeding the amount of water that could exist as water vapor in Previous HitgasTop at reservoir pressure and temperature.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $16
Open PDF Document: $28