About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Nelson, Philip H., 2014, Fluid production characteristics in Pinedale and Jonah fields, in M. Longman, S. Kneller, T. Meyer, and M. Chapin, eds., Pinedale field: Case study of a giant tight gas sandstone reservoir: AAPG Memoir 107, p. 533547.

DOI:10.1306/13511900M1073327

15

Fluid Production Characteristics in Pinedale and Jonah Fields

Philip H. Nelson

U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected])

ABSTRACT

Gas, oil, and Previous HitwaterNext Hit production data were compiled for selected wells in Pinedale and Jonah fields, Wyoming, for the purpose of quantifying the fluid production from two tight gas systems. Production of gas, oil, and Previous HitwaterNext Hit from each well is represented by two samples taken five years apart, with the first sample typically taken two years after commencement of production. For each well, summary diagrams of oil versus gas and Previous HitwaterNext Hit versus gas production show fluid production rates, the change in rates after five years, the Previous HitwaterNext Hit-gas and oil-gas ratios, and the fluid type. These diagrams allow well-to-well and field-to-field comparisons. Fields producing Previous HitwaterNext Hit at low rates (with a lower limit based on Previous HitwaterNext Hit vapor in gas in the reservoir) can be distinguished from fields producing Previous HitwaterNext Hit at moderate or high rates, and the Previous HitwaterNext Hit–gas ratios are quantified.

Gas production rates are higher in Jonah field than in Pinedale field at both the first and second samples, and the average gas production rate for the second sample is about half that of the first sample for both fields. Previous HitWaterNext Hit production rates are generally substantially higher in Pinedale than in Jonah, and Previous HitwaterNext Hit–gas ratios in Pinedale are roughly a factor of ten greater in Pinedale than in Jonah. Gas and Previous HitwaterNext Hit production rates for each field are fairly well grouped, indicating that Pinedale and Jonah fields behave as distinct but fairly cohesive gas–Previous HitwaterNext Hit systems. In particular, Pinedale field appears to be remarkably uniform in its flow behavior with time. Jonah field, although internally faulted, exhibits a small spread in first-sample production rates.

In all wells examined from the two fields, Previous HitwaterNext Hit production commenced with gas production—there are no examples of wells with Previous HitwaterNext Hit-free production and no examples where Previous HitwaterNext Hit production began after first-sample gas production. Previous HitWaterNext Hit production rates declined in all wells in Pinedale field from the first to the second sample, whereas in Jonah field, half the wells showed increases and half showed decreases during the five-year period. Most wells had Previous HitwaterNext Hit–gas ratios exceeding the amount of Previous HitwaterNext Hit that could exist as Previous HitwaterTop vapor in gas at reservoir pressure and temperature.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $16
Open PDF Document: $28