About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes


Memoir 111: 3-D Structural Interpretation: Earth, Mind, and Machine, 2016
Pages 155-171
DOI: 10.1306/13561991M1111540

Chapter 10: 3-D Seismic-Structural Workflows – Examples Using the Hat Creek Fault System

Graham Yielding, Brett Freeman


Modern subsurface exploration uses a three-dimensional (3-D) approach to interpret faults and layer boundaries on seismic reflection data. Three-dimensional seismic reflection datasets comprise a continuous volume of reflection samples with a vertical and horizontal resolution, of typically <15 m (c.50 ft). Increasing computer power has allowed the development of interpretation software that allows for direct mapping within an on-screen 3-D representation of the data. The seismic data volume can be processed to emphasize reflections from continuous layers, or to emphasize the discontinuities (e.g., faults) affecting those layers. A key workflow is to build the interpretation of horizons (layer boundaries) and faults into a consistent framework model, where all the stratigraphic and structural surfaces fit together in a geologically realistic way. Such a model is the necessary starting point for structural geological studies and for assessing trap geometry and viability. The framework model also provides the starting geometry for building an engineering model for simulating fluid flow in hydrocarbon reservoirs.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Protected Document: $10
Internal PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24