|
|
|
M.
P. A. Jackson
Bureau of Economic Geology
The University of Texas
at Austin
Austin, Texas
U.S.A.
|
|
The
truth is that whoever touches this enticing subject...is bound to indulge
freely in speculation. The problem is so broad, the factors involved are
so numerous, and the work to be done with regard to salt structures is
so great that we cannot...[restrict our speculation to the narrow] limits
of exact knowledge.
--Everett DeGolyer,
1925
Although this is no place
in which to describe the adventures of a petroleum geologist it may, perhaps,
be said that the carrying out of the geological work referred to was greatly
hampered owing to much of the time being spent as a prisoner in the hands
of Italian, Turk and Arab.
--Arthur Wade,
mapping salt domes,
Red Sea coast of Arabia,
1912
|
---|
|
Abstract
The conceptual
breakthroughs in understanding salt tectonics can be recognized by reviewing
the history of salt tectonics, which divides naturally into three parts:
the pioneering era, the fluid era, and the brittle era.
The pioneering era
(1856-1933) featured the search for a general hypothesis of salt diapirism,
initially dominated by bizarre, erroneous notions of igneous activity,
residual islands, in situ crystallization, osmotic pressures, and
expansive crystallization. Gradually data from oil exploration constrained
speculation. The effects of buoyancy versus orogeny were debated, contact
relations were characterized, salt glaciers were discovered, and the concepts
of downbuilding and differential loading were proposed as diapiric mechanisms.
The fluid era (1933-~1989)
was dominated by the view that salt tectonics resulted from Rayleigh-Taylor
instabilities in which a dense fluid overburden having negligible yield
strength sinks into a less dense fluid salt layer, displacing it upward.
Density contrasts, viscosity contrasts, and dominant wavelengths were emphasized,
whereas strength and faulting of the overburden were ignored. During this
era, palinspastic reconstructions were attempted; salt upwelling below
thin overburdens was recognized; internal structures of mined diapirs were
discovered; peripheral sinks, turtle structures, and diapir families were
comprehended; flow laws for dry salt were formulated; and contractional
belts on divergent margins and allochthonous salt sheets were recognized.
The 1970s revealed the basic driving force of salt allochthons, intrasalt
minibasins, finite strains in diapirs, the possibility of thermal convection
in salt, direct measurement of salt glacial flow stimulated by rainfall,
and the internal structure of convecting evaporites and salt glaciers.
The 1980s revealed salt rollers, subtle traps, flow laws for damp salt,
salt canopies, and mushroom diapirs. Modeling explored effects of regional
stresses on domal faults, spoke circulation, and combined Rayleigh-Taylor
instability and thermal convection. By this time, the awesome implications
of increased reservoirs below allochthonous salt sheets had stimulated
a renaissance in salt tectonic research.
Blossoming about 1989, the
brittle
era is actually rooted in the 1947 discovery that a diapir stops rising
if its roof becomes too thick. Such a notion was heretical in the fluid
era. Stimulated by sandbox experiments and computerized reconstructions
of Gulf Coast diapirs and surrounding faults, the onset of the brittle
era yielded regional detachments and evacuation surfaces (salt welds and
fault welds) along vanished salt allochthons, raft tectonics, shallow spreading,
and segmentation of salt sheets. The early 1990s revealed rules of section
balancing for salt tectonics, salt flats and salt ramps, reactive piercement
as a diapiric initiator resulting from tectonic differential loading, cryptic
thin-skinned extension, influence of sedimentation rate on the geometry
of passive diapirs and extrusions, the importance of critical overburden
thickness to the viability of active diapirs, fault-segmented sheets, counter-regional
fault systems, subsiding diapirs, extensional turtle structure anticlines,
and mock turtle structures. |
---|