About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
Edited By Authors:
Published |
Klusman, R. W., and M. A. Saeed, 1996, Comparison of light hydrocarbon microseepage mechanisms, in D. Schumacher and M. A. Abrams, eds., Hydrocarbon migration and its near-surface expression: AAPG Memoir 66, p. 157-168. | ||||||||||||
Chapter
12
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Diffusion fails to explain the rapid disappearance of surface anomalies after production from a reservoir begins. Diffusion is sufficiently rapid to dissipate gas reservoirs quickly in the geologic sense. As a vertical migration mechanism, it also cannot account for the resolution observed in surface anomalies. Diffusion as a mechanism for primary migration of hydrocarbons from source rocks and as a transport mechanism in the near-surface unsaturated zone have been demonstrated. Solubilities of light hydrocarbons in water are low at ambient temperatures, but increase dramatically with increasing temperatures at depth in basins. Transport with water, either in solution or as a separate hydrocarbon phase, is important in secondary migration. Computer modeling of the process using finite-difference techniques fails to explain the observed resolution and rapid disappearance of surface anomalies. We favor the vertical migration mechanism of displacing water by ascending gas bubbles, that is, the "buoyancy of microbubbles." Computer modeling of this mechanism does explain surface observations. The close correspondence of surface anomalies with surface projections of a reservoir and the rapidly disappearing surface anomalies after the start of production are predicted by this model. |
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |