About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
Edited By Authors:
Published |
Klusman, R. W., and M. A. Saeed, 1996, Comparison of light hydrocarbon microseepage mechanisms, in D. Schumacher and M. A. Abrams, eds., Hydrocarbon migration and its near-surface expression: AAPG Memoir 66, p. 157-168. | ||||||||||||
Chapter
12
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Diffusion fails to explain
the rapid disappearance of surface anomalies after production from a reservoir
begins. Diffusion is sufficiently rapid to dissipate gas reservoirs quickly
in the geologic sense. As a vertical migration mechanism, it also cannot
account for the resolution observed in surface anomalies. Diffusion as
a mechanism for primary migration of hydrocarbons from source rocks and
as a transport mechanism in the near-surface unsaturated zone have been
demonstrated. Solubilities of light hydrocarbons in water are low at ambient
temperatures, but increase dramatically with increasing temperatures at
depth in basins. Transport with water, either in solution or as a separate
hydrocarbon phase, is important in secondary migration. Computer modeling
of the process using finite-difference techniques fails to explain the
observed resolution and rapid disappearance of surface anomalies.
We favor the vertical migration
mechanism of displacing water by ascending gas bubbles, that is, the "buoyancy
of microbubbles." Computer modeling of this mechanism does explain surface
observations. The close correspondence of surface anomalies with surface
projections of a reservoir and the rapidly disappearing surface anomalies
after the start of production are predicted by this model. |
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |