About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
Edited By Published |
Utilization of Hydrocarbon Seep Information
Oil and gas are mobile fluids
and rocks are generally permeable. Surface oil and gas seeps primarily
reflect avenues of migration (or escape) from deeper and sometimes laterally
distant locations. Moreover, because avenues of migration (or escape) from
deeper accumulations vary considerably in the degree to which they are
sealed, the quantitative size of a seep has little relationship to the
size of the accumulation. Some small accumulations are marked by strong
visible seepages, whereas some of the largest accumulations are so well
sealed that they show no visible seepages and only microscopic seepages
or none at all. The value of seepages, visible or microscopic, is thus
largely a matter of the accuracy with which they can be interpreted geologically.
In some case (e.g., Burgan field) a well drilled vertically at the site
of seepage would have discovered the field. In other cases where escape
of hydrocarbons has been along low dipping fault planes or low dipping
carrier beds, surface seepages may be many miles laterally from vertical
superposition over the oil or gas accumulation. Again, the value of the
information on the seepage, visible or microscopic, is always there, but
it is only the geologic interpretation that allows cashing in on its value.
On land, most visible seepages
have already been recorded and the nature of the relationship to subsurface
petroleum accumulations has been at least studied if not always successfully
determined. The main task now for geochemical prospecting is the identification
of the invisible or less clearly manifested "seepages" that can be determined
only by detailed chemical analysis of fluids in surface and near-surface
rocks. The problems are not whether there is any value to the data but
rather are (1) the techniques for identification, (2) the geologic interpretation,
and (3) the quality of the interpretation good enough to justify the cost.
Offshore, the situation is
slightly different. Visual observation of offshore seepages has been impeded
by the water cover, and reliance must be placed mainly on chemical analysis
of the water column and the interstitial waters filling the pores of the
blanket of young sediment covering the sea floor. Again, there seems to
me no question of the innate value of the geochemical information, positive
or negative. And again, the problems are with the techniques of identification
and geologic interpretation, and whether the interpretation is good enough
to justify costs. There is nothing wrong with the concept; it is only a
question of our ability to collect the data adequately and to interpret
the results correctly, at a reasonable cost.
A geochemical survey should
be thought of not as a black magic means of spotting the location of oil
and gas pools but only as a simple common sense method of gathering data
on hydrocarbon occurrences too dilute to make visible seeps or impregnations--data
which if collected reliably, interpreted wisely, and used intelligently
along with all other lines of evidence will always be helpful in petroleum
exploration of any area.
|
View the First Page
A text abstract of this article is not available. The first page of the PDF appears below.
You may download the first page as a PDF.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |