About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

R. Sorkhabi and Y. Tsuji, 2005, Faults, fluid flow, and petroleum traps: AAPG Memoir 85, p. 1-31.

DOI:10.1306/1033713M853128

Copyright copy2005 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists.

The Place of Faults in Petroleum Traps

Rasoul Sorkhabi,1 Yoshihiro Tsuji2

1Technology Research Center, Japan National Oil Corporation, Chiba, Japan; Present address: Energy amp Geoscience Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.
2Technology Research Center, Japan National Oil Corporation, Chiba, Japan; Present address: Technology Research Center, Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation, Chiba, Japan.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We express our gratitude to numerous researchers in the academe and industry who have contributed to Japan National Oil Corporation's Project on Evaluation of Traps and Seals (1997–2003); some of them are represented by their articles in this volume. Our thanks also are extended to our colleagues who have supported the project in managing positions, including Satoshi Sasaki, Hisashi Ishida, Masanori Okamoto, Uko Suzuki, H. Hasegawa, Daichi Sato, and Masamichi Fujimoto. We also greatly appreciate John Lorenz, Jack Thomas, Jim Handschy, Steve Naruk, Raymond Levey, and David Curtiss for reading this article and for their comments to improve it; we alone, however, are responsible for any error.

ldquoThe incompleteness of available data in most geological studies traps some geologists.rdquo
Orlo E. Childs in Place of tectonic concepts in geological thinking (AAPG Memoir 2, 1963, p. 1)
ldquoAlthough the precise role of faults has never been systematically defined, much has been written that touches on the subject. One thing is certain: we need not try to avoid them.rdquo
Frederick G. Clapp in The role of geologic structure in the accu mulation of petroleum (Structure of typical American oil fields II, 1929, p. 686)

ABSTRACT

Ever since Frederick Clapp included Previous HitfaultNext Hit structures as significant petroleum traps in his landmark paper in 1910, the myriad function of faults in petroleum migration and accumulation in sedimentary basins has drawn increasing attention. Previous HitFaultNext Hit analyses in petroleum traps have grown along two distinct and successive lines of thought: (1) Previous HitfaultNext Hit closures and (2) Previous HitfaultNext Hit-rock seals. Through most of the last century, geometric closure of Previous HitfaultNext Hit traps and reservoir seal juxtaposition by faults were the focus of research and industrial application. These research and applications were made as structural geology developed quantitative methods for geometric and kinematic analyses of sedimentary basins, and plate tectonics offered a unified tool to correlate faults and basins on the basis of the nature of plate boundaries to produce stress. Over the last two decades, compartmentalization of reservoirs by Previous HitfaultNext Hit seals has been more intensively investigated as three-dimensional seismic images better resolve Previous HitfaultNext Hit structures. Geometric characterization of Previous HitfaultNext Hit architecture, identification of various sealing processes in Previous HitfaultNext Hit zones, and quantitative appraisal of petrophysical properties of Previous HitfaultNext Hit rocks have significantly advanced in recent decades.

Previous HitFaultNext Hit-seal analyses have shifted from two-dimensional Previous HitfaultNext Hit juxtapositions to three-dimensional models encompassing Previous HitfaultNext Hit surfaces, Previous HitfaultNext Hit transmissibility, and juxtaposed reservoir units. Current methodologies for Previous HitfaultNext Hit-seal assessment mostly address normal faults in clastic reservoirs. Previous HitFaultNext Hit sealing processes in thrust faults and in carbonate reservoirs represent important blind spots in our knowledge. Shale smear has been effectively applied for sealing assessment of syndepositional faults in sandstone-claystone successions. However, Previous HitfaultNext Hit-seal analyses based merely on shale smear ignore other important sealing processes, notably cataclasis and cementation in Previous HitfaultNext Hit zones. During their active stages, faults are conduits of subsurface fluids, irrespective of any sealing mechanism that operated before Previous HitfaultNext Hit rupture. Therefore, a comprehensive Previous HitfaultNext Hit-seal assessment needs to be a four-dimensional model integrating Previous HitfaultNext Hit motions, Previous HitfaultNext Hit-zone processes, and fluid flow. This remains a major challenge. However, integration of in-situ Previous HitfaultNext Hit stress analysis and Previous HitfaultNext Hit-seal analysis has provided a technological breakthrough. The realization that Previous HitfaultNext Hit rocks are low-permeability and high-capillarity features in sedimentary basins has given an economic impetus for exploration of Previous HitfaultNext Hit traps. The shift from modeling of single-phase fluid flow to multiphase or even mixed-phase fluid flow along and across Previous HitfaultNext Hit zones will be of more value to these exploration efforts. Recent studies have transformed the old polarized view of faults as either leaks or seals into realistic notions of more complex Previous HitfaultNext Hit-fluid flow behavior. Current shortcomings in Previous HitfaultNext Hit-seal assessment are largely caused by the scarcity of detailed data and the need for robust calibration of numerical models. This implies that empirical data will form the cornerstone of near-future advances in Previous HitfaultTop-seal methodologies.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24