About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
Briedis, N. A., D. Bergslien, A. Hjellbakk, R. E. Hill, and G. J. Moir,
DOI:10.1306/1209853M873259
2007 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Recognition Criteria, Significance to Field Performance, and Reservoir Modeling of Sand Injections in the Balder Field, North Sea
Nowell A. Briedis,1 Dag Bergslien,2 Andor Hjellbakk,3 Rob E. Hill,4 Gordon J. Moir5
1Esso Norge AS, Stavanger, Norway
2Esso Norge AS, Stavanger, Norway
3Esso Norge AS, Stavanger, Norway
4ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
5ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Esso Norge AS for allowing us to publish the results of this study and the many colleagues who helped with the geological and geophysical interpretation throughout the years. We particularly thank Achim Hohrath, Tone Straume, and Kari Osnes, for their enthusiasm and technical support, and Innes Ferguson and Mike Peacock for their vision and managerial support.
We thank the many colleagues at the ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company and also the ExxonMobil Exploration, Development and Production companies, who helped with the sand injection outcrop work, reevaluation of the Balder cores and seismic data, and building of the geologic and reservoir-simulation models. We particularly thank Peter Vrolijk, Don Ying, Brooks Clark, Anil Deshpande, Randi Lewis, Bob Rossen, Gann-Shyong Wang, Michael Sun, and Maurice Stadler, and also former colleagues David Mohrig and Julio Friedmann, for their enthusiasm and technical support.
ABSTRACT
The Balder field comprises seven structurally and stratigraphically trapped oil accumulations, in three separate stratigraphic intervals of Paleocene to early Eocene age. The reservoirs are deep-water gravity-flow–deposited sands, draped and sealed by hemipelagic mud and volcanic tuff. Strong initial reservoir compartmentalization has been significantly modified by postdepositional sand remobilization and sand injection.
Sand injections were first recognized in 1969, in core from one of the early exploration wells. At the time, they were not thought to be significant. More than 150 sand injections have subsequently been identified in cores from the exploration, appraisal, and development drilling programs. This led to the realization that they were not just isolated occurrences but a common phenomenon that could impact production. In addition to the cores, sand injections are now recognized and mapped using seismic and well-log correlations, aided by principles derived from outcrop observation.
Initial geologic and reservoir modeling of the Balder field consisted of separate models for each of the seven main accumulations. This was partially caused by the complexity of sand distribution and an incomplete understanding of how individual sand bodies might be interconnected. It was also caused by limitations in available software for building and simulating models of high complexity. The field went on production in September 1999. In early 2000, when the first phase of infill drilling was considered and more efficient tools for geologic and reservoir modeling were available, the decision was taken to build a full-field model. To better understand how to incorporate the sand injections, outcrop analogs were studied to develop models for injection dimensions, orientations, and distribution patterns. Following the outcrop work, a detailed reexamination of the Balder core, log, and seismic data was undertaken, cataloging all evidence for sand injections in the field. Strict criteria were developed for recognizing sand injections of all scales.
Full-field geologic and reservoir models have now been built for the field, incorporating both the depositional and injected sand bodies. Because of resolution limitations, particularly with the smaller and more steeply inclined sand injections, parts of the model are nonunique. Ongoing production history matching has led to model modifications, which continue to adhere to the core, well-log, and seismic constraints, but now yield improved matches to individual well performances and gas-water breakthrough histories. This has been an iterative process, which is expected to continue throughout the life of the field. The full-field model is now being used to predict future production milestones and help identify optimum locations for potential infill drilling and well workovers.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |