About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Elsley, G. R., and H. Tieman, 2010, A comparison of prestack depth and prestack time imaging of the Paktoa complex, Canadian Beaufort MacKenzie Basin, in L. Wood, ed., Shale tectonics: AAPG Memoir 93, p. 7990.

DOI:10.1306/13231309M933419

Copyright copy2010 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists.

A Comparison of Prestack Depth and Prestack Time Imaging of the Paktoa Complex, Canadian Beaufort MacKenzie Basin

G. R. Elsley,1 H. Tieman2

1Devon Canada Corporation, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
2Previous HitAppliedNext Hit Geophysical Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Peter Graham of Niko Resources (formerly of Devon Canada) for his geological contributions to this paper, and we would also like to thank Paul Feldman of Previous HitAppliedNext Hit Geophysical Services for his work on the depth imaging of the Previous HitseismicNext Hit volume.

ABSTRACT

The Canadian Beaufort MacKenzie Basin (BMB) contains many examples on two-dimensional Previous HitseismicNext Hit sections of what appear to be shale diapirs or shale-cored anticlines. Devon Canada acquired three-dimensional (Previous Hit3-DNext Hit) Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit across one such feature called Paktoa and, in the winter of 2006, drilled an exploration well flanking the possible shale diapir. Although the well successfully tested oil Previous HitfromNext Hit the Eocene Taglu unit, no clear evidence existed that the structure was a shale diapir instead of a shale-cored or fractured anticline.

Tests of a Kirchoff prestack depth migration (PSDM) algorithm prior to drilling had resulted in no significant improvement. Following the drilling of the Paktoa C-60 well, Previous HitAppliedNext Hit Geophysical Services used their proprietary beam algorithm to image very steeply dipping reflectors in the core of the Paktoa structure. Interpretation of this new Previous HitseismicNext Hit volume shows that Paktoa is an Previous HitinversionNext Hit anticline, likely formed by the reactivation of an earlier extensional fault system, and not a shale diapir.

The beam PSDM took just three weeks to apply to 400 km2 (154 mi2) of marine Previous Hit3-DNext Hit Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit, and the vastly improved imaging has not only changed the interpretation of the Paktoa structure but also implies that many similar features in the Canadian BMB may also be steeply dipping anticlines instead of shale diapirs or shale-cored anticlines.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24