About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

Laughrey, Christopher D., and John A. Harper, 2012, Upper Cambrian Gatesburg Formation of central and western Pennsylvania, in J. R. Derby, R. D. Fritz, S. A. Longacre, W. A. Morgan, and C. A. Sternbach, eds., The great American carbonate bank: The geology and economic resources of the Cambrian–Ordovician Sauk megasequence of Laurentia: AAPG Memoir 98, p. 1165–1194.

DOI:10.1306/13331533M981116

Copyright copy2012 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists.

Upper Cambrian Gatesburg Formation of Central and Western Pennsylvania

Christopher D. Laughrey,1 John A. Harper2

1Weatherford Laboratories, Golden, Colorado, U.S.A.
2Pennsylvania Geological Survey, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This report is a summary of research done in the early 1990s as part of a study of the Rose Run Sandstone of Ohio under the auspices of the Appalachian Oil and Natural Gas Research Consortium at West Virginia University. We acknowledge the work of Mark Baranoski, Richard Carlton, and Ron Riley of the Ohio Division of Geologic Survey, whose work during that project has helped enhance this chapter. Les Chubb, formerly of the Pennsylvania Geological Survey, ran x-ray diffraction scans of core samples and assisted with the preparation of thin sections. The manuscript of this chapter was substantially improved by the careful scrutiny and insightful comments of John F. Taylor, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, and we appreciate his review. The authors, however, accept full responsibility for the contents and interpretations made in this chapter.

ABSTRACT

Carbonate and interbedded siliciclastic-carbonate rocks of the Upper Cambrian Gatesburg Formation represent deposition on, and proximate to, the great American carbonate bank (GACB), a broad, rimmed platform of low relief that was subject to periodic sea level changes. This environmental setting produced a series of Previous HitcomplexNext Hit mixed carbonate and carbonate-siliciclastic sequences (dominated by carbonates) with limited lateral continuity between outcrops and wells. Many of the rocks formed on the GACB are targets of active petroleum exploration in western and north-central Pennsylvania, as well as in other areas of the Appalachian Basin. Potential Previous HitreservoirNext Hit targets include the Upper Cambrian Upper Sandy member of the Gatesburg Formation (Rose Run Sandstone of Kentucky and Ohio) and paleotopographic highs and paleokarst in the Mines Member of the Gatesburg Formation below the Knox unconformity (considered to be part of the Beekmantown throughout much of the Appalachian Basin). Although the latter typically are seismic plays, with companies searching for both stratigraphic and structural traps, knowledge of the patterns of sedimentation on the GACB is also critical to exploration efforts. Mixtures of carbonate and siliciclastic rocks resulted from spatial and temporal variability in depositional systems across the GACB, creating acute and Previous HitcomplexNext Hit Previous HitreservoirNext Hit heterogeneities. The distribution of porous and permeable sandstone and carbonate facies within the Cambrian sequence, as well as the juxtaposition of sandstones and paleokarst beneath the Knox unconformity, undoubtedly influenced the migration of fluids, including brines that Previous HitdiageneticallyNext Hit altered many of the rocks, primarily through dolomitization. The spatial distribution of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit seals, Previous HitreservoirNext Hit compartmentalization, and Previous HitdiageneticallyTop controlled pore geometry are partially or wholly sedimentologic features.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24