About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
Andrew
--A Small Oil and Gas Field in the
UKCS North Sea
from:![]()
Chapter 5
The Use of Horizontal Wells to Optimize the Development of
Andrew
--A Small Oil and
Gas Field in the UKCS North Sea
L. Jolley
M. Nicol
A. Frankenbourg
A. Leonard
J. Wreford
BP Exploration
Aberdeen, U.K.
ABSTRACT
Andrew
field is a small oil and gas field with a 58-m oil column, a 66-m gas cap,
and a simple dome structure, producing entirely from horizontal wells. It has been a
successful development for BP and the
Andrew
field partners, with plateau oil production
extending 18 months beyond the predicted onset of field decline. Development success has
been helped substantially by focusing presanction activity on key reservoir uncertainties
and business decisions. The decisions that resulted were to drill all horizontal producers
to optimize low gas-oil-ratio (GOR) oil recovery, to closely manage the reservoir under
production, to delay gas coning and water breakthrough, and to collect sufficient
surveillance data to allow regular updating of the reservoir management plan. The
objective of the
Andrew
development is to maximize oil recovery before going to gas-cap
blowdown. The challenge is to manage the GOR throughout the life of the field. Central to
this are well design, location, numbers, and the drawdown strategy. The horizontal wells
produce at higher rates (average 10 MBOPD) and at relatively lower drawdown pressures (100
psi). They recover increased reserves per well (13 MMBO per well), compared with a
conventional well. Project economics were improved as well numbers were reduced from 24 in
a conventional well case to 10 horizontal producers. Low GOR oil production has been
maximized by well positioning relative to the gas-oil contact (GOC) and oil-water contact
(OWC); by drilling long wells that enter the reservoir on the crest and exit through the
flank of the field; and by completion design, perforation strategy, careful well
management, and drilling two additional infill wells. As a result, the recovery factor has
risen from 45% at sanction in July 1996 to 49% by the end of 2002. The final field
recovery factor is expected
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |