About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract


Pub. Id: A167 (1985)

First Page: 209

Last Page: 222

Book Title: M 39: Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Stratigraphy II: An Integrated Approach to Hydrocarbon Exploration

Article/Chapter: Stratigraphic Velocity Interpretation: National Petroleum Reserve--Alaska: Chapter 12

Subject Group: Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Stratigraphy, Previous HitSequenceNext Hit Stratigraphy

Spec. Pub. Type: Memoir

Pub. Year: 1985

Author(s): E. W. Peikert

Abstract:

The objective of stratigraphic velocity interpretation is to predict parameters such as lithology, fluid content, porosity, and formation pressure from Previous HitseismicNext Hit velocity data. Data from three sources are required to meet this objective: 1) stacked Previous HitseismicNext Hit sections; 2) Previous HitseismicNext Hit velocity profiles; and 3) well data. Interpreted Previous HitseismicNext Hit velocity profiles are combined with Previous HitsequenceNext Hit boundary times marked on the stacked sections to compute Previous HitsequenceNext Hit-keyed interval velocities. Interval velocities can be smoothed between Previous HitsequenceNext Hit Previous HitboundariesNext Hit on a rational geological basis. Smoothed, Previous HitsequenceNext Hit-keyed interval velocities are the basis for prediction of lithology and other parameters. These same velocities can also be used for migration, and time-depth conversion, as well as for determinat on of the low frequency component for inverse model studies.

Well data, either from the immediate area or from a geologic look-alike elsewhere, are required to understand the geological significance of the Previous HitseismicNext Hit velocity data. Well data are used to determine interval velocity versus depth curves which reflect the normal compaction trends for various lithologies. These curves are applied to Previous HitsequenceNext Hit-keyed Previous HitseismicNext Hit velocities to correct for normal compaction effects. Variations that remain after these corrections are mapped and used for prediction of lithology, porosity, fluid type, and formation pressure.

Previous HitSeismicNext Hit velocity data, by themselves, often lead to ambiguous interpretation. However, comparison of velocity maps with Previous HitseismicNext Hit facies and structure maps and with other Previous HitseismicTop parameters such as amplitude and continuity can lead to a final interpretation that is compatible with all available sources of information.

An example of lithology prediction in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska is used to illustrate the major steps in the stratigraphic velocity interpretation procedure.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24