About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract


 
Chapter from: SG 42:  Applications of 3-D Seismic Data to Exploration and Production

Edited by: 
Paul Weimer and Thomas L. David

Authors:
Bruce S. Hart, David M. Sibley, and Peter B. Flemings


 


Published 1996 as part of Studies in Geology  42
Copyright © 1996 The American Association of Petroleum Geologists.  All Rights Reserved.
 

*Editorial Note: Page numbers in this digital version (HTML and PDF) do not correspond to those of the hardcopy.
Otherwise, the two are the same.
 

CHAPTER 2

Chapter 2: Reservoir Compartmentalization by Depositional Features in a Pleistocene Shelf Margin (Lowstand) Delta Complex, Eugene Island Block 330 Field, Louisiana Offshore

Bruce S. Hart*Ý, David M. Sibley§, and Peter B. Flemings*

Hart, S., D. M. Sibley, and P. B. Flemings, Reservoir compartmentalization by depositional features in a Pleistocene shelf margin (lowstand) delta complex, Eugene Island Block 330 Field, Louisiana Offshore, in P. Weimer and T. L. Davis, eds., AAPG Studies in Geology No. 42 and SEG Geophysical Developments Series No. 5, AAPG/SEG, Tulsa, 
p. 21-26.

 

ABSTRACT

We integrate 3-D seismic, wireline log, and production data to demonstrate that seismic amplitude maps of two pools in a Pleistocene lowstand delta complex of the offshore Gulf of Mexico image reservoir compartmentalization by depositional features and faults. The GA interval of the Eugene Island Block 330 Field is composed of stacked deltaic lobes, each of which consists of complex associations of distributary channels, clinoforms, and base-of-slope failure complexes. Production is from "updip" facies (including delta front and mouth bar sands) at the top of the interval. The highest amplitudes associated with the seismic horizon that marks the flooding surface at the top of the reservoir are associated with high-porosity (and high-permeability) clean, charged sands that depositional processes have not distributed uniformly. One of the two pools has a gas cap, and so the high amplitude response is expected (classic "bright spot"). The other pool has no gas cap, but the charged sands are also associated with high amplitudes because the in situ gas-oil-ratio of the oil is high (400 to 500 scf/bbl). In this second pool, there is a good qualitative relationship between production character and the combination of seismic amplitudes and structural position, with the best, most consistent production from high-amplitude areas on the crest of an anticline.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24