About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

J. W. Robinson and K. W. Shanley, 2004, Jonah Field: Case Study of a Tight-Gas Fluvial Reservoir: AAPG Studies in Geology 52 and Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists 2004 Guidebook.

Copyright copy2004. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

Burial-history Previous HitModelingNext Hit of the Jonah Field Area: An Unusual and Possibly Unique Gas Accumulation in the Green River Basin, Wyoming

Robert J. Coskey

Platte River Associates. Inc., Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank Douglas Battin, Barry McBride, Fred Meissner, Steve Kneller, John Robinson, Keith Shanley, and Gary Stewart for their time, geological insight, and frequent input throughout the course of writing this chapter. Their local knowledge was instrumental in defining the geologic constraints that were applied to the burial-history models. Platte River Associates, Inc., provided the necessary time, critical review, Previous HitmodelingNext Hit software, and technical support for model development and refinement. EnCana, U.S.A. provided additional pyrolysis data that aided in model calibration.

ABSTRACT

The hydrocarbon accumulation at Jonah field is the result of a complex series of temporal and spatial geologic events. This chapter is a preliminary investigation using burial-history Previous HitmodelingNext Hit and petroleum-systems analysis to evaluate the generative potential of source rocks in the Jonah and Pinedale anticline areas and determine the timing of generation and expulsion. To test the ability of the Lance to self-generate significant hydrocarbons through thermal maturation, burial-history models were constructed with source intervals containing type III kerogen and average initial total organic carbon values ranging from 1.00 to 1.25%. Models built using optimistic charge parameters show that in the Jonah area, the Lance is capable of generating 1.79 tcf gas and, depending on the saturation threshold applied, can only expel from 0 to 0.64 tcf gas. Source rock pyrolysis data indicate that the Lance does not contain sufficient organic material, and burial-history models calibrated with vitrinite reflectance data suggest that potential Lance source material was not exposed to the thermal conditions necessary to generate and expel the quantities of hydrocarbons estimated to be present in the Jonah trap. Generation, expulsion, and migration (vertical and/or horizontal) from the Mesaverde Group and Rock Springs Formation or deeper hydrocarbon sources such as the Mowry Shale are necessary to account for the in-place hydrocarbons. The source potential of the coal-bearing lower Mesaverde is significantly greater that that of the Lance, and Previous HitmodelingNext Hit suggests that in the Jonah area, it is capable of generating 5.48 tcf and expelling 4.06–5.12 tcf gas.

Previous HitModelingTop suggests that within the Jonah field area, the source rocks included in the Lance, upper Mesaverde, and lower Mesaverde formations can only provide the Jonah trap with between 2.61 and 3.98 tcf gas in place. This gas volume is significantly less than current in-place estimates of 8.3 tcf and suggests that gas must be generated and migrated from either deeper sources such as the Hilliard Shale or Mowry Shale and/or have migrated to the Jonah trap from a larger fetch area.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24