About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Special Volumes

Abstract

McVay, D. A., R. O. Bello, W. B. Ayers Jr., G. A. Hernandez, J. A. Rushing, S. K. Ruhl, M. F. Hoffmann, and R. I. Ramazanova, 2009, Evaluation of the technical and economic feasibility of CO2 sequestration and enhanced coalbed methane recovery in Texas low-rank coals, in M. Grobe, J. C. Pashin, and R. L. Dodge, eds., Carbon dioxide sequestration in geological media—State of the science: AAPG Studies in Geology 59, p. 665688.

DOI:10.1306/13171270St591255

Copyright copy2009 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists.

Evaluation of the Technical and Economic Feasibility of CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery in Texas Low-Rank Coals

Duane A. McVay,1 Rasheed O. Bello,2 Walter B. Ayers Jr.,3 Gonzalo A. Hernandez,4 Jay A. Rushing,5 Steve K. Ruhl,6 Mike F. Hoffmann,7 Rahila I. Ramazanova8

1Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering, Texas AampM University, College Station, Texas, U.S.A.
2Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering, Texas AampM University, College Station, Texas, U.S.A.
3Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering, Texas AampM University, College Station, Texas, U.S.A.
4Ecopetrol, Bogota, Colombia
5Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
6Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
7Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
8BP North America Gas, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) through contract DE-FC26-02NT41588. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation provided data and cooperative wells for testing, without which this study would have been much more limited. We thank the Society of Petroleum Engineers for releasing the copyright on an earlier version of this chapter, which was presented at the 2006 Gas Technology Symposium (Hernandez et al., 2006). We thank reviewer Matt Mavor for constructive comments on an earlier draft of the chapter.

ABSTRACT

Carbon dioxide (CO2) from energy consumption is a primary anthropogenic greenhouse gas. Injection of CO2 in coalbeds is a plausible method of reducing atmospheric emissions, and it can have the additional benefit of enhancing methane recovery from coal. Most previous studies have evaluated the merits of CO2 disposal in high-rank coals. The objective of this research is to determine the technical and economic feasibility of CO2 sequestration in, and enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery from, low-rank coals in the Texas Gulf Coast area. Our research included an extensive coal characterization program, deterministic and probabilistic simulation studies, and economic evaluations. We evaluated both CO2 and flue-gas injection scenarios.

In this study, coal-core samples and well pressure transient test data were obtained for characterization of Texas low-rank coals. Simulation studies evaluated the effects of well spacing, injectant fluid composition, injection rate, and dewatering on CO2 sequestration and ECBM recovery.

Probabilistic simulation of 100% CO2 injection in an 80-ac five-spot pattern indicates that Wilcox Group coals can store 1.27–2.25 bcf of CO2 at depths of 6200 ft (1890 m), with an ECBM recovery of 0.48–0.85 bcf. Simulation results of 50% CO2–50% N2 injection in the same 80-ac five-spot pattern indicate that these coals can store 0.86–1.52 bcf of CO2, with an ECBM recovery of 0.62–1.10 bcf. Simulation results of flue-gas injection (87% N2–13% CO2) indicate that these same coals can store 0.34–0.59 bcf of CO2 with an ECBM recovery of 0.68–1.20 bcf.

Economic modeling of CO2 sequestration and ECBM recovery for 100% CO2 injection indicates predominantly negative economic indicators for the reservoir depths and well spacings investigated, using natural gas prices ranging from $2 to $12/mscf and CO2 credits based on carbon market prices ranging from $0.05 to $1.58/mscf CO2 ($1.00 to $30.00/ton CO2). Injection of flue gas (87% N2–13% CO2) results in better economic performance than injection of 100% CO2.

Moderate increases in either gas prices or carbon credits could generate attractive economic conditions that, combined with the close proximity of many CO2 point sources near unminable coalbeds, could generate significant CO2 sequestration and ECBM potential in Texas low-rank coals.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24