About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Special Volumes
Abstract
Ruppel, S. C., and R. R. Harrington,
DOI:10.1306/13341536St63698
2012 by The American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Facies and Sequence Stratigraphy: Critical Tools for Reservoir Framework Definition, Fullerton Clear Fork Reservoir, Texas
Stephen C. Ruppel,1 Rebecca R. Harrington2
1Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, U.S.A.
2ExxonMobil Exploration Company, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The results presented in this chapter are part of a continuing research into the styles and causes of heterogeneity in shallow-water platform-carbonate reservoirs in the Permian Basin by the Bureau of Economic Geology (BEG). Discussions with colleagues at BEG, including Charlie Kerans, Robert Loucks, Jerry Lucia, and Jim Jennings, were especially helpful in formulating the interpretations presented herein. The funding for the study was provided by contract no. DE-FC26-01BC15351 from the U.S. Department of Energy. Additional funding for the study was provided by ExxonMobil and The University of Texas System. We thank David Smith, Terry Anthony, Steve Krohn, and Amy Powell of ExxonMobil, and Jeff Simmons, Craig Kemp, and John Stout of Oxy, for their contributions in organizing the project and in providing data. David Smith and Terry Anthony were especially helpful in providing insights into field geology and engineering issues. We also thank Stephen Hartman and Tim Hunt of The University of Texas System, West Texas Operations Office, for providing both collaborative funding and data. Ursula Hammes and Wayne Wright provided useful critical review comments that improved the manuscript.
ABSTRACT
Clear Fork reservoirs in the Permian Basin typically display a wide range of geologic and petrophysical properties that make the efficient recovery of hydrocarbons difficult. A key step in improving recovery efficiency is defining the patterns of variability in these rocks. The critical elements of variability that must be defined are facies, groupings of rocklike properties; and sequence architecture, the framework of facies variability. As in all carbonate reservoirs, rock-based studies must form a fundamental basis for characterizing and modeling facies and sequence architecture variability through the reservoir. Combined with wireline-log data, they provide a basis for defining both rock attribute distributions and reservoir framework.
At Fullerton field, we used 29 cores (14,000 ft [
4270 m]), well logs from approximately 800 wells, three-dimensional seismic data, and outcrop data to define facies (rock attributes) and sequence stratigraphy (reservoir framework). The Fullerton reservoir section averages 500 ft (152 m) that can be subdivided into three stratigraphic units (Abo, Wichita, and Lower Clear Fork) and parts of two composite and six high-frequency sequences. At the base of the reservoir section, Abo rocks (sequences L1.1 and L1.2) consist of clinoformal, outer-platform, subtidal, fusulinid-crinoid packstones that exhibit locally excellent porosity and permeability characteristics but are highly variable in continuity. Wichita rocks were deposited in peritidal tidal-flat settings and consist of mud-rich facies that generally display poor continuity and commonly very low permeability and oil saturation despite locally high porosity. Wichita rocks (sequences L1.2 and L2.0) are updip inner-platform equivalents of both partly underlying Abo and overlying Lower Clear Fork facies. Lower Clear Fork rocks (sequences L2.1 and L2.2) are dominantly middle-platform subtidal, grain-rich ooid-peloid packstone and grainstone facies that exhibit the best permeability and oil saturation properties.
Although basic facies distributions are defined by high-frequency sequence architecture, the reservoir framework must be based on the correlation of higher resolution depositional cycles. Because gamma-ray logs showed little or no relationship to facies and cyclicity, we calibrated porosity logs to cyclicity and used them to define 10 to 15 ft (3 to 5 m) cycles throughout the reservoir.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |