About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

West Texas Geological Society

Abstract


West Texas Geological Society Bulletin
Vol. 41 (2001), No. 4. (December), Pages 4-9

Enhancement of the Three-Dimensional Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Method through the use of Well Control and Previous HitSeismicNext Hit-Modeling Techniques in the Resolution of Fourth-Order Depositional Sequences within the Grayburg Reservoir, Foster Field, Ector County, Texas - Part I

W. Hoxie Smith, James J. Reeves

Abstract

The study area is located in sections 31 and 32 of T&PRR block 42, Township 2S, and sections 35, 36, 37 and 38 of T&PRR block 43, which is about 3 miles southwest of downtown Odessa.

Pre-existing well data shows the Grayburg Formation can be divided into fourth-order shallowing upward sequences, that are 60 to 130 ft (18.3 to 39.6 m) thick. Previous work has also shown the Grayburg dips very gently to the east. The spatial distribution of flow parameters important in reservoir characterization is controlled, in part, by fourth-order depositional sequences or sets of sequences forming the reservoir.

Within the study area, the Grayburg Formation occurs at a depth of roughly 4000 feet, and is composed of dolomitic limestones with a sonic velocity of roughly 17,000 feet second. Previous HitSeismicNext Hit modeling was used to investigate the conventional frequency band near (50 Hz) and bandwidth (20 to 75 Hz) necessary to image fourth-order sequences within the Grayburg Formation. The thickness resolution of the model is roughly 85 feet, which is within the range of thicknesses of the fourth-order sequences. The modeling indicates that thickening and thinning of thin bed sequences cause tuning effects that need to be understood when picking sequence boundaries. For thin beds, geometrical considerations appear to predominate, making acoustic differences in lithology of secondary importance.

Conclusions from the modeling are:

  1. 3-D Previous HitseismicTop data need to be wavelet processed to zero phase, and relative amplitudes preserved, before comparison with modeling results to make interpretive stratigraphic decisions.

  2. Modeling algorithms may not include real-earth effects, such as dispersion, source-generated noise, attenuation, etc. These differences provide an element of uncertainty in the comparison of a modeled response to real data.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24