About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

West Texas Geological Society

Abstract


The Permian Basin: Proving Ground for Tomorrow's Technologies, 2000
Pages 129-135

Petrophysical Analysis of “Old” Well Logs in the Phillips Petroleum Company Austin #1 in the Austin Upper Mississippian Field Lea County, New Mexico

G. B. Asquith, Dean C. Hamilton

Abstract

The Phillips Petroleum Company Austin #1 well (SEC 17 14S-36E) was completed in 1957 as the discovery well for the Austin upper Mississippian Field in Lea County, New Mexico. The well had a CAOF of 9.925 mmcfgpd plus 152 bcpd and no water from upper Mississippian (Chester) ooid grainstones. The Austin #1 has produced 4.149 bcf plus 58,684 be and no water.

Due to the exploratory nature of the well, a very complete logging suite was run which consists of: 1) 18’8” Previous HitLateralNext Hit, 2) 10” Short Normal, 3) SP, 4) 32” Limestone Previous HitLateralNext Hit, 5) Microlog, and 6) Gamma Ray-Neutron. This very complete 1957-era logging suite, plus the knowledge of the production history gives us an opportunity to compare different methods of “Old Log Analysis” and compare the log analysis to the production. In the petrophysical analysis, Rw (0.026 at Tf) was determined from the SP; true formation resistivity (Rt) was determined from the 18’8” Previous HitlateralNext Hit log. Porosity was determined from the 32” limestone Previous HitlateralNext Hit, the microlog, and the old neutron log. Calculated net pay and hydrocarbon pore-ft (HCPFT) thickness for the Austin #1 using Vcl < = 20%, Porosity > = 8% and Sw < = 30% are 27 ft and 2.4 ft, using neutron porosity. Net pay and hydrocarbon pore-ft are 36 ft and 4.3 ft, respectively, using microlog porosity. Net pay and hydrocarbon pore-ft are 27 ft and 2.1 ft, respectively, using 32” limestone Previous HitlateralTop porosity. The different porosity logs did result in large variations in net pay and HCPT, however it is important to note that all calculated net pay and HCPFT values were enough so that the geologist or engineer would have made the correct decision to complete the well.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24