About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

West Texas Geological Society

Abstract


Resource Plays in the Permian Basin: Resources to Reserves, 2006
Pages 60-70

Azimuthal Variations in Previous HitReflectionNext Hit Seismic Data: Measurements Governed by the In-Situ Horizontal Stress Field and/or Vertical Aligned Fractures

Heloise B. Lynn, Walter S. Lynn

Abstract

The presence of unequal horizontal stresses and/or vertical aligned fractures affect seismic signal depending on their relative azimuths. The effect of the fractures and / or unequal horizontal stresses on the seismic signal depends on the relative scale length of the seismic waves and the aligned fractures. The azimuthal variations of seismic Previous HitreflectionTop signal are manifested in variations in travel time, amplitude, amplitude gradient, frequency and attenuation (Q). The increased use of wide-azimuth 3-D P-wave surveys has dramatically increased the awareness and use of azimuthal variations to infer pertinent features of the subsurface. S-waves are also sensitive to aligned fractures and / or unequal horizontal stresses. When an S-wave of arbitrary polarization (skew to the natural coordinate system) encounters fractures, it splits into two orthogonal modes which travel at different velocities and polarizations. These split S-waves (generally recorded as mode-converted PS reflections, or C-waves) provide additional information to the azimuthal signatures of P-wave data.

Acquiring seismic data at all azimuths and offsets is a necessary prerequisite to utilize seismic azimuthal anisotropy. 3D wide-azimuth PP field data acquisition requires offset equal to target depths, for all azimuths, with fold at least 2 times that required to form a migrated image (that is, to pick velocities). Processing can be accomplished in a variety of methods, but the all-azimuth scanning techniques have shown themselves to work well. Interpretation of azimuthal data is challenging and requires the co-rendering of, at least, 5 to 10 values for each map location. These values include the azimuthal seismic attributes as well as structure, faults, horizon curvature, and seismic inversion attributes.

This paper provides a basic understanding of the nature of P-wave and S-wave azimuthal anisotropy and the requirements for acquisition, processing and interpretation of full azimuth data. We will use recent field data publications from onshore North America to illustrate the practicality of the PP azimuthal measurements.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24