About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
West Texas Geological Society
Abstract
Reservoir
Geology of Devonian Strata and Their Response to Secondary and Tertiary Recovery, Dollarhide
Field
, Andrews County, Texas
Abstract
Devonian strata in Dollarhide
Field
are expected to produce three times as much oil during secondary and tertiary recovery as was recovered during primary production. The purposes of this paper are to show geological features which contributed to the prolific secondary and tertiary recovery, and to explain the implementation of the tertiary CO2 flood. Devonian strata of the Thirtyone Formation at Dollarhide
Field
originally contained 144 million barrels of oil (MMBO) in place with 18.6 MMBO produced by primary recovery, 39.3 MMBO projected to be produced by secondary recovery (waterflood), and 27.4 MMBO projected by tertiary recovery (CO2 flood). Dollarhide Devonian
Field
occurs in a faulted anticline. Although most porosity is secondary (diagenetic), porosity within Devonian strata follows depositional facies because most diagenesis is facies-selective. Devonian strata contain five main lithologies (from top to bottom): (1) upper dolomite (50-90 feet thick), (2) middle bioclastic limestone (47-92 feet), (3) laminated tripolitic chert (0-65 feet), (4) burrowed chert/dolomite (10-35 feet), and (5) interbedded microcrystalline chert and dolomite. These were deposited as a shallowing-upward sequence approximately 180 feet thick.
Porosity occurs in two stratigraphic zones separated by a tight limestone. The upper porosity zone in the upper dolomite is 0-90 feet thick and heterogeneous with stratified porosity which bifurcates, coalesces, and pinches out in several different intervals. The lower porosity zone (laminated tripolitic chert and part of the burrowed chert-dolomite; 0-100 feet thick) is generally unstratified and homogeneous with high porosity (commonly 25-35 %), moderate permeability (5-20 md), and good continuity. The homogeneity, moderate permeability, and good continuity of the lower
reservoir
allowed excellent secondary recovery and are ideal for uniform sweep during CO2 flood, whereas thinner, more heterogeneous, less-continuous, and more stratified pay in the upper
reservoir
should cause less uniform CO2 sweep.
Reservoir
continuity is interrupted by vertical faults which act as impediments to lateral flow, so CO2 flood patterns were arranged accordingly. CO2 injection began in the first flood area in mid-1985. Increased oil production associated with the CO2 flood started in early 1987 and has been increasing to the present. No channeling or premature CO2 breakthrough have been observed.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |