About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 47 (1963)

Issue: 9. (September)

First Page: 1769

Last Page: 1769

Title: Regionals and Residuals in Seismic Prospecting for Stratigraphic Features: ABSTRACT

Author(s): M. B. Dobrin, W. G. Rimmer

Article Type: Meeting abstract

Abstract:

Many geological features associated with oil accumulation show up on seismic Previous HitmapsNext Hit as interruptions of regional trends rather than as true structural closures. Among such features are reefs, which are often best detected by draping of overlying formations; erosional escarpments which truncate porous limestone beds on their updip sides; and buried ridges which cause productive stratigraphic build-ups in overlying beds. In the presence of regional tilting, seismic indications from such features can be so obscured that special data processing techniques are required to make them readily recognizable on seismic Previous HitmapsNext Hit.

The problem here is very similar to that of separating gravity and magnetic effects of features having economic interest from regional background. The techniques developed for accomplishing this type of separation, such as residual and second derivative determinations and orthogonal polynomials, can be applied advantageously to seismic data where regional Previous HitstructureNext Hit obscures significant anomalies. Both contour-smoothing or grid methods can be used depending on the nature of the problem and the preference of the interpreter. As with gravity or magnetics, the grid methods are particularly adaptable for high-speed electronic computation.

Some examples are shown where regional effects are removed from seismic Previous HitmapsNext Hit over known reefs and productive erosional escarpments by derivative and residual techniques using electronic computation.

A somewhat different approach is necessary when it is desired to remove the effect of velocity variation from Previous HittimeNext Hit Previous HitmapsNext Hit by treating the velocity function as a regional effect. Here the regional is multiplicative rather than additive and cross-product terms must be taken into account. By relating the Previous HittimeNext Hit Previous HitmapsNext Hit and velocity Previous HitmapsNext Hit using this approach, the principal hazards of using Previous HittimeNext Hit Previous HitmapsNext Hit for interpretation can be avoided.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 1769------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists