About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract


Volume: 56 (1972)

Issue: 9. (September)

First Page: 1895

Last Page: 1895

Title: Smackover Stratigraphic Traps--New Production in "Old" Areas: ABSTRACT

Author(s): J. J. Amoruso

Article Type: Meeting abstract

Abstract:

Until recently, most of the Smackover exploration has been essentially a search for closed structures. This initial Previous HitphaseNext Hit of exploration has been quite successful, and many excellent fields have been found throughout the fairway. However, in mature areas, such as southern Arkansas and northern Louisiana, this quest for structure has resulted in the drilling of most of the easily definable closures, and the future promised only prospects of ever-diminishing size and economic potential.

With increasing well control, however, stratigraphy has been recognized as an important factor in the entrapment of Smackover hydrocarbons, even in fields generally considered to be essentially structural accumulations. Awareness of the importance of stratigraphic factors in entrapment has been dramatically focused by the discovery of Walker Creek and Welcome fields, Lafayette and Columbia Counties, Arkansas. Both these fields are due to stratigraphic entrapment provided by the updip termination of porous Smackover beds across gentle structural noses. Their discovery signals the beginning of the second Previous HitphaseNext Hit of Smackover exploration--the search for combination structural-stratigraphic and wholly stratigraphic traps, and the rebirth of exploration for large reserves in a mature segment of the Smackover fairway.

The regionally regressive depositional character of the Smackover in this area afforded an excellent setting for the formation of many stratigraphic traps. Porous carbonate zones, successively higher within the Smackover section, were deposited southward across the shelf. The updip terminus of each zone abuts an impermeable seal to form an ideal stratigraphic trap. The sinuous nature of the updip terminus commonly, but not necessarily, in conjunction with low-relief structural noses or closures entraps the hydrocarbon accumulation laterally. In addition, many variations in the regional situation, due to the local depositional patterns of individual zones, tend to complicate the simple stratigraphic trap.

Lithologically, the most characteristic reservoir rock type is an oolitic-pelletal limestone with intergranular porosity. Porosity up to 30% is not unusual, but average porosity ranges from 10 to 20%. Various degrees of porosity destruction have resulted from the infilling of the primary porosity with sparry calcite cement. Where wave action was not sufficient to winnow out carbonate muds, no primary porosity was developed.

The diverse nature of the stratigraphic traps opens unlimited exploration opportunity on acreage once considered worthless because it was not located on closed structures. The stratigraphic Previous HitphaseNext Hit of exploration now promises to be as profitable as was the structural Previous HitphaseTop in this "old" producing area.

End_of_Article - Last_Page 1895------------

Copyright 1997 American Association of Petroleum Geologists