About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.

1Department of Geosciences, University
of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104.
2Department of Geosciences, University
of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104. Present address:
ARCO EPT, 2300 W. Plano Parkway, Plano, Texas 75075.
3Department of Petroleum Engineering,
University of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104.
4Petroleum Consultant, 1511 18th Avenue
East, Seattle, Washington 98112; e-mail: [email protected]
Oil
Company for providing access to data and offering
insights into the development of Glenn Pool field. We also thank L. Billingsley,
D. Richmond, and R. Tillman for their critical reviews and helpful suggestions.
ABSTRACT
Results reported here are part of a reservoir
characterization and management effort aimed at improving
oil
field, discovered
in 1905, is considered a mature field, and yet contains substantial amounts
of potentially remaining recoverable reserves. Glenn Pool is a giant
oil
field that has produced over 330 MMbbl (million barrels)
oil
from the Pennsylvanian
Bartlesville (Glenn) sandstone using primary and secondary methods, with
limited tertiary
recovery
efforts. Despite a long history of production,
some production tracts have recovered a total of only 21% of original
oil
in place, with many wells currently exhibiting water cuts of 99% or higher.
recovery
in Glenn
Pool field. This effort involves an industry-academic-government partnership
included within the U.S. Department of Energys Class I (fluvial-deltaic
reservoir) initiative. Focus of the Glenn Pool Project has been on the
Self unit, a 160 ac (64 ha) tract in the southeastern portion of the field.
A combination of detailed geologic study, geostatistical modeling, and
reservoir simulation has been employed to design and implement improved
recovery
strategies. A crucial result of this work has been a reinterpretation
of Bartlesville depositional systems and facies architecture in northeastern
Oklahoma. With only one-quarter of the total implementation plan in effect,
oil
production more than doubled, exceeding expectations. Water production,
however, remains high. Additional management plans are under consideration.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].
