About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
DOI:10.1306/11141111064
Source
rock
contributions to the Lower Cretaceous heavy
oil
accumulations in Alberta: A basin modeling study
rock
contributions to the Lower Cretaceous heavy
oil
accumulations in Alberta: A basin modeling study
Luiyin Alejandro Berbesi,1 Rolando di Primio,2 Zahie Anka,3 Brian Horsfield,4 Debra K. Higley5
1Organic Geochemistry, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ (GeoForschungsZentrum) German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; [email protected]
2Organic Geochemistry, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ (GeoForschungsZentrum) German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; [email protected]
3Organic Geochemistry, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ (GeoForschungsZentrum) German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; [email protected]
4Organic Geochemistry, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ (GeoForschungsZentrum) German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany; [email protected]
5U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The origin of the immense
oil
sand deposits in Lower Cretaceous reservoirs of the Western Canada sedimentary basin is still a matter of debate, specifically with respect to the original in-place volumes and contributing source rocks. In this study, the contributions from the main source rocks were addressed using a three-dimensional petroleum system model calibrated to well data. A sensitivity analysis of source
rock
definition was performed in the case of the two main contributors, which are the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member of the Fernie Group and the Upper Devonian–Lower Mississippian Exshaw Formation. This sensitivity analysis included variations of assigned total organic carbon and hydrogen index for both source intervals, and in the case of the Exshaw Formation, variations of thickness in areas beneath the Rocky Mountains were also considered. All of the modeled source rocks reached the early or main
oil
generation stages by 60 Ma, before the onset of the Laramide orogeny. Reconstructed
oil
accumulations were initially modest because of limited trapping efficiency. This was improved by defining lateral stratigraphic seals within the carrier system. An additional sealing effect by biodegraded
oil
may have hindered the migration of petroleum in the northern areas, but not to the east of Athabasca. In the latter case, the main trapping controls are dominantly stratigraphic and structural. Our model, based on available data, identifies the Gordondale source
rock
as the contributor of more than 54% of the
oil
in the Athabasca and Peace River accumulations, followed by minor amounts from Exshaw (15%) and other Devonian to Lower Jurassic source rocks. The proposed strong contribution of petroleum from the Exshaw Formation source
rock
to the Athabasca
oil
sands is only reproduced by assuming 25 m (82 ft) of mature Exshaw in the kitchen areas, with original total organic carbon of 9% or more.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].
