About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 98, No. 2 (February 2014), P. 315340.

Copyright copy2014. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI:10.1306/06251312156

Subsalt pressure prediction in the Miocene Mad Dog field, Gulf of Mexico

Michael P. Merrell,1 Peter B. Flemings,2 Glenn L. Bowers3

1Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78713–8924; present address: ConocoPhillips, Houston, Texas 77079-1175; [email protected]
2Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78713–8924; [email protected]
3Applied Mechanics Technologies, Houston, Texas; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Previous HitSandstoneNext Hit pressures follow the hydrostatic gradient in Miocene strata of the Mad Dog field, deep-water Gulf of Mexico, whereas pore pressures in the adjacent mudstones track a trend from well to well that can be approximated by the total vertical stress gradient. The Previous HitsandstoneNext Hit pressures within these strata are everywhere less than the bounding mudstone pore pressures, and the difference between them is proportional to the total vertical stress. The mudstone pressure is predicted from its porosity with an exponential porosity-versus-vertical effective stress relationship, where porosity is interpreted from wireline velocity. Sonic Previous HitvelocitiesNext Hit in mudstones bounding the regional sandstones fall within a narrow range throughout the field from which we interpret their vertical effective stresses can be approximated as constant. We show how to predict Previous HitsandstoneTop and mudstone pore pressure in any offset well at Mad Dog given knowledge of the local total vertical stress. At Mad Dog, the approach is complicated by the extraordinary lateral changes in total vertical stress that are caused by changing bathymetry and the presence or absence of salt. A similar approach can be used in other subsalt fields. We suggest that pore pressures within mudstones can be systematically different from those of the nearby sandstones, and that this difference can be predicted. Well programs must ensure that the borehole pressure is not too low, which results in borehole closure in the mudstone intervals, and not too high, which can result in lost circulation to the reservoir intervals.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].