About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
2015. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1306/07071413211
Permeability characterization of natural compaction bands using core flooding experiments and three-dimensional image-based analysis: Comparing and contrasting the results from two different methods
Shang Deng,1
Lin Zuo,2
Atilla Aydin,3
Jack Dvorkin,4
and Tapan Mukerji5
1Stanford University, Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford, California, 94305; [email protected]
2Stanford University, Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford, California, 94305; Chevron Energy Technology Company, Richmond, California; [email protected]
3Stanford University, Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford, California, 94305; [email protected]
4Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, California, 94305; Ingrain, Houston, Texas; [email protected]
5Stanford University, Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford, California; Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, California, 94305; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
We measured the permeability of 30 samples extracted from 6 sets of compaction bands and the adjacent host rocks of the Jurassic aeolian Aztec Sandstone exposed in the Valley of Fire State Park in Nevada using core flooding experiments. The results show that the permeability within the high-angle compaction bands (three sets) is consistently three orders of magnitude lower than that of the host rocks. For the bed-parallel compaction bands, the measured permeability reduction is about half an order to three orders of magnitude for two sets of bands, and there is no detected permeability reduction for the samples from one set. For the samples that show permeability reduction within high-angle and bed-parallel compaction bands, the results are generally consistent with the data estimated from two-dimensional segmented image analyses in previous studies.
Permeability of the samples used
in the laboratory experiments was also obtained numerically based on three-dimensional tomographic images scanned from micro-samples and lattice-Boltzmann flow simulations. In addition, backscatter electron images (BEI) and energy dispersive spectroscopy images (EDSI) of thin sections were
used
to estimate the clay content inside and outside the bands. Large differences exist between the lab-based and image-based permeability and porosity measurements of compaction bands and host rocks. Possible factors causing these differences are different sample sizes and heterogeneities within the host rocks, calibration on the image segmentation, and incomplete characterization of clay minerals and fines migration during lab-based experiments.
Given the wide range of permeability reductions within compaction bands of different orientations by different investigators, their impact on fluid flow should be evaluated case by case, one should consider their dimensions and distributions.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
Watermarked PDF Document: $14 | |
Open PDF Document: $24 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].