About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 102, No. 5 (May 2018), P. 885-912.

Copyright ©2018. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI: 10.1306/0609171618917155

Facies and architecture of river-dominated to tide-influenced mouth bars in the lower Lajas Formation (Jurassic), Argentina

Colleen Kurcinka,1 Robert W. Dalrymple,2 and Marcello Gugliotta3

1Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada; [email protected]
2Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada; [email protected]
3Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Central 7, Higashi 1-1-1, Tsukuba 305-8567, Japan; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

The Middle Jurassic Lajas Formation in the Neuquén Basin of Argentina has been considered an ideal analog for tide-dominated deposits because of the widespread presence of tidal sedimentary structures and its heterolithic nature. Outcrops of the Lajas in the Los Molles area provide excellent exposures allowing both sedimentary structures and large-scale architectural information to be documented in detail. The extensive event bed stratification that characterizes the delta front and interdistributary bay deposits is interpreted to be the result of river floods because of the sharp base, fining-upward grain size trend, and seaward-directed paleocurrent indicators within each bed. The absence of wave-generated structures precludes a storm wave origin for these beds. Interflood deposits have two forms. The first is fine-grained sandstone and siltstone that is highly bioturbated with no tidal structures and is indicative of an overall river-dominated system. The second is also finer grained than the river flood beds but shows distinctive tidal features, indicative of a tide-influenced system during times when river influence was least. Mouth bars can be classified as purely river-dominated or river-dominated with tidal influence, depending on the type of interflood beds present. Tide-influenced mouth bars tend to be muddier, with more internal flow baffles or barriers and a lower-angle dip than their river-dominated counterparts. This study suggests that heterolithic successions containing pervasive tidal structures need not be tide-dominated because not all tidal structures are of equal importance in environmental interpretations. Their location (in river flood layers versus interflood layers) can be used as a methodology for determining the dominant and subordinate processes responsible for shaping the delta.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].