About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
Petroleum
Geologists. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1306/09181817131
Re-evaluation of the porosity measurements under different confining pressures: A better appraisal of
reservoir
porosity
reservoir
porosity
Lin Pan,1 Stuart J. Jones,2 Xiao Wang,3 Wen Guan,4 and Longlong Li5
1Key Laboratory of Tectonics and
Petroleum
Resources (Ministry of Education), China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; Department of
Petroleum
Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; [email protected]
2Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom; [email protected]
3Key Laboratory of Tectonics and
Petroleum
Resources (Ministry of Education), China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; Department of
Petroleum
Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; [email protected]
4Huabei Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Zhengzhou, China; [email protected]
5Department of
Petroleum
Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Porosity is one of the most important rock
properties
in describing hydrocarbon reservoirs. Tests on core samples provide direct and representative porosity data, and the measurement of porosity at high confining pressures is recognized to correlate well with subsurface
reservoir
porosity. Whereas theoretical deductions of the changes and relationships of pressures, volumes, and compressibility suggest that porosity is reduced during the coring and lifting processes, the porosity measurement at elevated confining pressure does not evaluate original
reservoir
porosity. This theory is quantitatively validated by repeated laboratory experiments of loading and unloading on sandstone core samples. When the in situ confining pressure is approximately 30–35 MPa (∼4350–5076 psi), coring and lifting would cause a porosity reduction of approximately 1.2%–1.6%, and the porosity test under high confining stress results in further porosity loss. A revised approach in calculating
reservoir
porosity from cored samples is proposed and can have significant implications for reserve calculations, recovery factors, and geostatistical
reservoir
models. The study is important for both conventional and unconventional reservoirs because it discusses a fundamental mechanism of porosity change.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].