About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
DOI: 10.1306/09181817131
Re-evaluation of the
porosity
measurements under different confining pressures: A better appraisal of reservoir
porosity
porosity
measurements under different confining pressures: A better appraisal of reservoir
porosity
Lin Pan,1 Stuart J. Jones,2 Xiao Wang,3 Wen Guan,4 and Longlong Li5
1Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources (Ministry of Education), China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; Department of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; [email protected]
2Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom; [email protected]
3Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources (Ministry of Education), China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; Department of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; [email protected]
4Huabei Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Zhengzhou, China; [email protected]
5Department of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Porosity
is one of the most important rock properties in describing hydrocarbon reservoirs. Tests on core samples provide direct and representative
porosity
data, and the measurement of
porosity
at high confining pressures is recognized to correlate well with subsurface reservoir
porosity
. Whereas theoretical deductions of the changes and relationships of pressures, volumes, and compressibility suggest that
porosity
is reduced during the coring and lifting processes, the
porosity
measurement at elevated confining pressure does not evaluate original reservoir
porosity
. This theory is quantitatively validated by repeated laboratory experiments of loading and unloading on
sandstone
core samples. When the in situ confining pressure is approximately 30–35 MPa (∼4350–5076 psi), coring and lifting would cause a
porosity
reduction of approximately 1.2%–1.6%, and the
porosity
test under high confining stress results in further
porosity
loss. A revised approach in calculating reservoir
porosity
from cored samples is proposed and can have significant implications for reserve calculations, recovery factors, and geostatistical reservoir models. The study is important for both conventional and unconventional reservoirs because it discusses a fundamental mechanism of
porosity
change.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].