About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

AAPG Bulletin, V. 103, No. 12 (December 2019), P. 2835-2859.

Copyright ©2019. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.

DOI: 10.1306/03061917284

Characteristics of micropores, pore throats, and movable fluids in the tight sandstone oil reservoirs of the Yanchang Formation in the southwestern Ordos Basin, China

Fujie Jiang,1 Chunlin Zhang,2 Ke Wang,3 Zhengfu Zhao,4 and Kesu Zhong5

1State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping, Beijing, China; [email protected]
2Langfang Branch, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Langfang, Hebei, China; [email protected]
3State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping, Beijing, China; [email protected]
4State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping, Beijing, China; [email protected]
5State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping, Beijing, China; [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Thin-section analysis, field emission scanning electron microscopy, constant-rate mercury injection (CRMI), x-ray–computed tomography (X-CT), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were used to investigate pore systems, pore sizes, and pore-throat distributions and determine evaluation criteria for tight oil reservoirs.

This research shows that the average porosity of the reservoirs in the Chang 63 to Chang 72 Members of the Yanchang Formation of the Ordos Basin ranges from 4% to 16%, with a corresponding average permeability of 0.1 to 0.4 md. The main pore types in these tight oil reservoirs are dissolution pores and intergranular pores, and the main pore-throat types are laminated throats and control-shaped throats. Based on experimental results, the pore-throat distributions differ among different testing techniques. The results of this study indicate that a combination of CRMI-derived and X-CT–detected pore-throat distributions is most suitable for calibrating NMR-derived pore sizes over the full range of pore sizes. The lower pore-throat radius limit of effective reservoirs is 0.24 μm, and the lower permeability limit for the flow of movable fluid is 0.008 md. Based on a cluster analysis, the studied tight oil reservoirs can be divided into three types. Compared with type III reservoirs (porosity < 8% and 0.008 md < permeability < 0.05 md), type I (porosity > 11% and permeability > 0.15 md) and type II (8% < porosity < 11% and 0.05 md < permeability < 0.15 md) reservoirs are of relatively good quality.

Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24

AAPG Member?

Please login with your Member username and password.

Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].