About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
DOI: 10.1306/03061917284
Characteristics of micropores,
pore
throats, and movable fluids in the tight sandstone oil reservoirs of the Yanchang Formation in the southwestern Ordos Basin, China
pore
throats, and movable fluids in the tight sandstone oil reservoirs of the Yanchang Formation in the southwestern Ordos Basin, China
Fujie Jiang,1 Chunlin Zhang,2 Ke Wang,3 Zhengfu Zhao,4 and Kesu Zhong5
1State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping, Beijing, China; [email protected]
2Langfang Branch, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Langfang, Hebei, China; [email protected]
3State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping, Beijing, China; [email protected]
4State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping, Beijing, China; [email protected]
5State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping, Beijing, China; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Thin-section analysis, field emission scanning electron microscopy, constant-rate mercury injection (CRMI), x-ray–computed tomography (X-CT), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were used to investigate
pore
systems,
pore
sizes, and
pore
-throat distributions and determine evaluation criteria for tight oil reservoirs.
This research shows that the average porosity of the reservoirs in the Chang 63 to Chang 72 Members of the Yanchang Formation of the Ordos Basin ranges from 4% to 16%, with a corresponding average permeability of 0.1 to 0.4 md. The main
pore
types in these tight oil reservoirs are dissolution pores and intergranular pores, and the main
pore
-throat types are laminated throats and control-shaped throats. Based on experimental results, the
pore
-throat distributions differ among different testing techniques. The results of this study indicate that a combination of CRMI-derived and X-CT–detected
pore
-throat distributions is most suitable for calibrating NMR-derived
pore
sizes over the full range of
pore
sizes. The lower
pore
-throat radius limit of effective reservoirs is 0.24 μm, and the lower permeability limit for the flow of movable fluid is 0.008 md. Based on a cluster analysis, the studied tight oil reservoirs can be divided into three types. Compared with type III reservoirs (porosity < 8% and 0.008 md < permeability < 0.05 md), type I (porosity > 11% and permeability > 0.15 md) and type II (8% < porosity < 11% and 0.05 md < permeability < 0.15 md) reservoirs are of relatively good quality.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].