About This Item
- Full TextFull Text(subscription required)
- Pay-Per-View PurchasePay-Per-View
Purchase Options Explain
Share This Item
The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database
AAPG Bulletin
Abstract
AAPG Bulletin, V.
DOI: 10.1306/12222019138
Comparison of gas, Klinkenberg, and liquid
permeability
of
sandstone
: Flow regime and pore size
permeability
of
sandstone
: Flow regime and pore sizeTobias Orlander,1 Harald Milsch,2 and Ida Lykke Fabricius3
1Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; [email protected]
2
GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany; [email protected]
3Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Liquid
permeability
of sedimentary rocks is relevant in several contexts, but gas
permeability
is easier to measure, so liquid
permeability
is typically estimated from gas
permeability
via empirical or semiempirical correction procedures. A frequently used and trusted procedure is the well-known Klinkenberg correction, which is based on the pressure dependence of gas
permeability
. However, from gaseous and liquid flow-through experiments on a series of Fontainebleau, Castlegate, Bentheim, and Obernkirchen sandstones, this study indicates that the equivalent liquid
permeability
derived from gas
permeability
via the Klinkenberg correction only compares with liquid
permeability
, when the gaseous flow adheres to Darcy’s law. The lower and upper limits to Darcy flow are defined by the Knudsen and Reynolds numbers, respectively. Both numbers can be estimated from
porosity
and pore-throat distribution, so from these properties, it is possible to assess the flow and pressure limits for the applicability of the Klinkenberg correction. For the studied sandstones, non-Darcy flow is indicated for the largest pores with diameters above approximately 10 μm, causing an erroneous Klinkenberg correction. Knudsen diffusion takes place in pores smaller than approximately 0.1 μm, but the contribution to the overall gas
permeability
of these small pores is, however, insignificant in these sandstones. Liquid
permeability
modeled from contributions from each pore size by using Kozeny’s equation and surface relaxation times from nuclear magnetic resonance data shows that the largest pores have no positive effect on
permeability
because of the existence of pore throats; instead, they may have a negative effect on
permeability
because of turbulence.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $16 | |
| Open PDF Document: $28 |
AAPG Member?
Please login with your Member username and password.
Members of AAPG receive access to the full AAPG Bulletin Archives as part of their membership. For more information, contact the AAPG Membership Department at [email protected].