About This Item

Share This Item

The AAPG/Datapages Combined Publications Database

GCAGS Transactions

Abstract


Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions
Vol. 45 (1995), Pages 377-384

Upper Cretaceous Sequence Stratigraphy of the Mississippi - Alabama Area

Ernest A. Mancini (1,2), T. Markham Puckett (1), Berry H. Tew (1,2), Charles C. Smith (1)

ABSTRACT

Three depositional sequences, associated with cycles of change in relative Previous HitseaNext Hit Previous HitlevelNext Hit and coastal onlap, can be identified in the Upper Cretaceous (Santonian, Campanian, and Maastrichtian) strata of the Mississippi-Alabama area. These depositional sequences have an event spacing of 2 to 11 million years and are herein designated the UZAGC-3.0 (Upper Zuni A, Gulf Coast), UZAGC-4.0, and UZAGC-5.0 sequences. The UZAGC-3.0 Previous HitcycleNext Hit comprises a lower type 1 sequence boundary (Tuscaloosa-Eutaw contact); lowstand Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract (Eutaw Formation); first transgressive surface or disconformity (Eutaw-Tombigbee contact); transgressive Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract (Tombigbee Sand Member of the Eutaw Formation and the lower Mooreville Chalk); surface of maximum transgression or submarine disconformity (within the Mooreville Chalk); and highstand Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract (upper Mooreville Chalk and its Arcola Limestone Member, basal Demopolis sandy beds, Coffee Sand, Tupelo Tongue of the Coffee Sand). The UZAGC-4.0 Previous HitcycleNext Hit includes a lower type 2 sequence boundary (Coffee or Tupelo Tongue contact with the Demopolis or Sardis Formation or a contact recognized within the Demopolis), which is coincident with the first transgressive surface; transgressive Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract (Demopolis marls, Sardis Formation); surface of maximum transgression within the Demopolis Chalk; and highstand Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract (Demopolis Chalk and its Bluffport Marl Member, Coon Creek Formation, Ripley Formation, McNairy Sand). The UZAGC-5.0 Previous HitcycleNext Hit includes a lower sequence boundary (McNairy Sand contact with the Owl Creek Formation or Chiwapa Sandstone Member of the Ripley Formation or a disconformity recognized within the Ripley Formation), which can he coincident with the first transgressive surface; transgressive Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract (Chiwapa or Ripley calcareous sands, Prairie Bluff or Owl Creek marts); surface of maximum transgression within the Prairie Bluff or Owl Creek; and highstand Previous HitsystemsNext Hit tract (Prairie Bluff or Owl Creek beds).

The component Previous HitsystemsNext Hit Previous HittractsNext Hit and defining physical surfaces of these sequences have been recognized and traced from Selmer (Tennessee) to Selma (Alabama), a distance of about 420 km. The sequence boundaries and transgressive surfaces are diachronous along their traces. The transgressive Previous HitsystemsTop tract deposits of a given sequence become progressively younger in age from the basin proper to the basin margin. Only the maximum flooding surfaces and/or condensed section strata have chronostratigraphic significance for regional and worldwide correlation. The synchronous nature of the maximum flooding surface is illustrated by the fact that from the basin proper to the basin margin the beds immediately above this surface rest with the same biostratigraphic zones. Therefore, depositional cycles should be dated by using the synchronous surface (maximum flooding surface) rather than the diachronous surface (sequence boundary or transgressive surface) associated with them. Three such maximum flooding events are evident in the Santonian through Maastrichtian strata of the Mississippi Embayment area. They occur in lower Campanian, upper Campanian, and middle Maastrichtian strata.


Pay-Per-View Purchase Options

The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.

Watermarked PDF Document: $14
Open PDF Document: $24