About This Item
Share This Item
Abstract
Journal of Sedimentary Research, Section
B: Stratigraphy and Global Studies
Vol. 65B (1995)No.
1. (February), Pages 132-141
Lowstand Shorefaces, Transgressive Incised Shorefaces, and Forced Regressions:
Examples from the Viking Formation, Joarcam Area, Alberta
Roger G. Walker, Terrence R. Wiseman (*)
ABSTRACT
In the Joarcam-Beaverhill Lake area of Alberta, there are three long (40
km), narrow (5 km) sandbodies in the late Albian Viking Formation. They
are surrounded by offshore open marine mudstones and have previously been
interpreted as offshore bars. However, the sandbodies are both underlain
and overlain by erosion surfaces. Joarcam is the only field with abundant
cores, and the sandbody shows a sandier-upward and coarsening-upward succession.
All three fields have recently been reinterpreted in the literature as
lowstand shoreface deposits, but the order in which they formed remains
controversial. Our well log cross sections suggest that the Lindbrook shoreface
was the first to form at a time of maximum lowstand of sea level. It was
truncated as sea level began to rise, and the Lindbr ok transgressive surface
of erosion (TSE) has been traced into the erosion surface that underlies
Joarcam. Joarcam can therefore be interpreted as a shoreface incised during
a pause in an overall transgression. Both the Lindbrook and Joarcam shorefaces
appear to be truncated by the regressive surface of erosion (RSE) that
underlies Beaverhill Lake. This suggests that Beaverhill Lake is the youngest
of the shorefaces and implies a second major fall of relative sea level.
The lowstand shorefaces tend to be thinner because of reduced accommodation
space during sea level fall. They tend to prograde farther (Beaverhill
Lake, about 23 km) because of abundant sediment supply at lowstand, but
consist largely of sandstone directly overlying the RSE. At Beaverhill
Lake, the shoreface sediments prograded at least 10 km before any mud in
the offshore-to-shoreface transition was preserved.
By contrast, the transgressive shorefaces tend to be thicker because
of accommodation space created during transgression. However, they tend
not to prograde so far (Joarcam, up to 13 km), possibly because of reduced
supply of sediment to the shoreface during transgression.
The two proposed episodes of lowering of relative sea level are tentatively
correlated with the two separate valley incisions documented at Crystal,
about 90 km to the southwest. These incisions represent type 1 sequence
boundaries, but the boundaries are not continuous regressive surfaces of
erosion from Crystal to the Joarcam-Beaverhill Lake area. In both cases,
the falling-stage RSEs have been eroded by the subsequent TSEs; these TSEs
are the only surfaces preserved between the incised valleys and the lowstand
shorefaces.
Pay-Per-View Purchase Options
The article is available through a document delivery service. Explain these Purchase Options.
| Watermarked PDF Document: $14 |
Watermarked Document – A Watermarked Document is branded with the name of the original licensed customer to discourage unauthorized users from sharing the document outside the user's organization. The PDF is no longer restricted to one machine, but can be circulated to others in the same company or department. A Watermarked Document also can be printed for hard copy distribution internally but is not authorized for outside distribution nor posting on the internet. Users will not be able to cut-and-paste text or images from one document to another.
|
| Open PDF Document: $24 |
Open Document – An Open Document is a fully functional PDF that can be circulated (a digital copy or hard-copy printed documents) outside the purchasing organization. Purchase of an Open Document does NOT constitute license for republication in any form, nor does it allow web posting without prior written permission from AAPG/Datapages ([email protected]).
|
GIS Map Publishing Program
